lmql VS basaran

have been experimenting with guidance and lmql. a bit too early to give any well formed opinions but really do like the idea of constraining llm output.

the only time i've ever felt like it was anything other than guesswork was using LMQL . not coincidentally, LMQL works with LLMs as autocomplete engines rather than q&a ones.

lqml

This is also similar in spirit to LMQL

https://github.com/eth-sri/lmql

LLM calls are just function calls, so most functional composition is already afforded by any general-purpose language out there. If you need fancy stuff, use something like Python‘s functools.

Working on https://github.com/eth-sri/lmql (shameless plug, sorry), we have always found that compositional abstractions on top of LMQL are mostly there already, once you internalize prompts being functions.

LMQL is another.

What are the current best "no reinventing the wheel" approaches to have Langchain use an LLM through a locally hosted REST API, the likes of Oobabooga or hyperonym/basaran with streaming support for 4-bit GPTQ?

Disclaimer: I am curating LLM-tools on github [1]

A few thoughts:

* allow for custom endpoint URLs, this way people can use open source LLMs with a fake openAI API backend like basaran[2] or llama-api-server[3]

* look into better embedding methods for info-retrieval like InstructorEmbeddings or Document Summary Index

* Don't use a single embedding per content item, use multiple to increase retrieval quality

1 https://github.com/underlines/awesome-marketing-datascience/...

2 https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran

3 https://github.com/iaalm/llama-api-server

open-source alternative to the OpenAI text completion API (https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran)

Guanaco-65B[0] using Basaran[1] for your OpenAI compatible API. You can use any ChatGPT front-end which lets you change the OpenAI endpoint URL.

[0] An fp4 finetune of LLaMA-30B by Tim Dettmers

[1] https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran

For lm-eval, I think you'd either need to take GPTQ's inference script and shim it into a model: https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/master/lm_eval/models or you might be able to use a project like https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran and then you could use the gpt3 model...

There are also: - Basaran repo: "Basaran is an open-source alternative to the OpenAI text completion API. It provides a compatible streaming API for your Hugging Face Transformers-based text generation models". "...Compatibility with OpenAI API and client libraries..."; - llama-cpp-python repo: "Simple Python bindings for @ggerganov's llama.cpp library...". "...OpenAI-like API...".

I want to start with a totally freely available model, so again, that excludes things like LLaMA where the weights are only available through a wait list. The two models that most get my attention and (I think, and hope) fit my criteria of open availability are Cerebras-GPT (13b) and Bloomz (7b). The tools to process and fine-tune that seem most feasible to me, from my limit knowledge, are xturing and basaran.