basaran VS NeMo-Guardrails

What are the current best "no reinventing the wheel" approaches to have Langchain use an LLM through a locally hosted REST API, the likes of Oobabooga or hyperonym/basaran with streaming support for 4-bit GPTQ?

Disclaimer: I am curating LLM-tools on github [1]

A few thoughts:

* allow for custom endpoint URLs, this way people can use open source LLMs with a fake openAI API backend like basaran[2] or llama-api-server[3]

* look into better embedding methods for info-retrieval like InstructorEmbeddings or Document Summary Index

* Don't use a single embedding per content item, use multiple to increase retrieval quality

1 https://github.com/underlines/awesome-marketing-datascience/...

2 https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran

3 https://github.com/iaalm/llama-api-server

open-source alternative to the OpenAI text completion API (https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran)

Guanaco-65B[0] using Basaran[1] for your OpenAI compatible API. You can use any ChatGPT front-end which lets you change the OpenAI endpoint URL.

[0] An fp4 finetune of LLaMA-30B by Tim Dettmers

[1] https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran

For lm-eval, I think you'd either need to take GPTQ's inference script and shim it into a model: https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/master/lm_eval/models or you might be able to use a project like https://github.com/hyperonym/basaran and then you could use the gpt3 model...

There are also: - Basaran repo: "Basaran is an open-source alternative to the OpenAI text completion API. It provides a compatible streaming API for your Hugging Face Transformers-based text generation models". "...Compatibility with OpenAI API and client libraries..."; - llama-cpp-python repo: "Simple Python bindings for @ggerganov's llama.cpp library...". "...OpenAI-like API...".

I want to start with a totally freely available model, so again, that excludes things like LLaMA where the weights are only available through a wait list. The two models that most get my attention and (I think, and hope) fit my criteria of open availability are Cerebras-GPT (13b) and Bloomz (7b). The tools to process and fine-tune that seem most feasible to me, from my limit knowledge, are xturing and basaran.

- https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails/

Here's "jailbreak detection", in the NeMo-Guardrails project from Nvidia:

https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails/blob/327da8a42d5f8...

I.e. they ask the llm if the prompt will break the llm. (I believe that more data /some evaluation on how well this performs is intended to be released. Probably fair to call this stuff "not battle tested".)

I have been playing around with some models locally and creating a discord bot as a fun side project, and I wanted to setup some guardrails on inputs / outputs of the bot to make sure that it isn't violating any ethical boundaries. I was going to use Nvidia's Nemo guardrails, but they only support openai currently. Are there any other good ways to control inputs?

Thanks, I hadn't seen those. I did find https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails earlier but haven't looked into it yet.

I'm not sure it solves the problem of restricting the information it uses though. For example, as a proof of concept for a customer, I tried providing information from a vector database as context, but GPT would still answer questions that were not provided in that context. It would base its answers on information that was already crawled from the customer website and in the model. That is concerning because the website might get updated but you can't update the model yourself (among other reasons).

you can use guard rails with langchain - https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails