lisp-interpreter VS fastlane

For example: After reading Hackers & Painters, I think Lisp is novel and unique and decided to learn more. (btw, the cover image is a Lisp interpreter written in Ruby by myself. It's simple but also takes me a lot of time) But this is a slow and inefficient process. On the other hand, since there are not many people using Lisp, it is difficult for me to ask for help.

The source code on GitHub: vonhyou/lisp-interpreter

Fastlane: For mobile development, Fastlane is an automation tool that can automate the building and releasing of iOS and Android apps.

The 20 testers closed beta should be very easy to automate through Fastlane and a script, I think https://www.20testers.com/ is already using this, seeing that they say "We run automated tests on 20 separate Google accounts for 14 consecutive days. The testing involves interacting with your app in a human-like manner - pressing buttons, filling in inputs, etc.".

Fastlane is an open-source platform designed to simplify Android and iOS deployment. It allows you to automate every aspect of your development and release workflow.

Fastlane

The issue with logs and detailed descriptions can be found here: https://github.com/fastlane/fastlane/issues/21385

-> You can use codepush. -> If you like me, you can use fastlane https://fastlane.tools/ -> You can use Expo OTA without use expo too :)

Building your app using only GitHub Actions is possible, but it's definitely not a straightforward process. There are tools such as Fastlane and of course XCode Cloud that simplifies this process, however my goal was a solution that was not dependent on third party libraries or services.

Yep, MIT licensed FOSS just like Godot itself :)

Fastlane - self-hosted solution for building apps on a "box in the closet".