jupyter-book
pandoc
jupyter-book | pandoc | |
---|---|---|
15 | 420 | |
3,692 | 32,449 | |
0.8% | - | |
8.5 | 9.8 | |
7 days ago | 2 days ago | |
Python | Haskell | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | GNU General Public License v2.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
jupyter-book
-
I don't always use LaTeX, but when I do, I compile to HTML (2013)
Sphinx supports ReStructuredText and Markdown.
MyST-Markdown supports MathJaX and Sphinx roles and directives. https://myst-parser.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
jupyter-book supports ReStructuredText, Jupyter Notebooks, and MyST-Markdown documents:
You can build Sphinx and Jupyter-Book projects with the ReadTheDocs container, which already has LaTeX installed: https://github.com/executablebooks/jupyter-book/issues/991
myst-templates/plain_latex_book:
-
Ask HN: Fastest way to turn a Jupyter notebook into a website these days?
your task is very very broad
you mention you don't want to deal with AWS, if it's because of ad-hoc installation concerns and nothing else you can just run your notebooks in ready-made solutions like Google Colab, or Jupyter-book in Github ( https://github.com/executablebooks/jupyter-book ))
that would cover a lot of use cases right away without next to no learning curve
If you don't want to deal with AWS or similar, in that case:
- if it's a static notebook then you can obviously render it and serve the web content (might seem obvious but needs to be considered)
- if it's dynamic but has light hardware requirements, you can try jupyterlite which runs in the browser and should do a pyodine (webassembly CPython kernel) can do: https://jupyterlite.readthedocs.io/en/latest/try/lab/
- otherwise, you can try exposing a dockerised jupyter env ( as in https://github.com/MKAbuMattar/dockerized-jupyter-notebook/b... ) or even better a nixified one ( https://github.com/tweag/jupyenv )
there might be other approaches I'm missing, but I think that's pretty much it that doesn't entail some proprietary solution or an ad-hoc installation as you've been doing
-
How to raise the quality of scientific Jupyter notebooks
Note: If you want to present a cleaner version of the notebook without assertions, you can use Jupyter book to render it into a site and use the remove-cell tag to omit assertions from the output.
-
Sunday Daily Thread: What's everyone working on this week?
See this thread for example.
-
Are there any frameworks/methodologies/libraries that can help to create a PDF printable professionally looking written report?
And maybe take a look at executablebooks/jupyter-book.
- [P] I Made An Easy-To-Use Python Package That Creates Beautiful Html Reports From Jupyter Notebooks
- RStudio Is Becoming Posit
-
Python toolkits
Our team has transferred from Sphinx for documentation to JupyterBook. There have been some growing pains with it but I prefer the look of the output and being able to play with the examples on Colab or Binder at the click of a button is a great feature.
- Ask HN: Tools to generate coverage of user documentation for code
- Why does [::-1] reverse a list?
pandoc
-
Beautifying Org Mode in Emacs (2018)
My main authoring tool is then Emacs Markdown Mode (https://jblevins.org/projects/markdown-mode/). For data entry, it comes with some bells and whistles similar to org-mode, like C-c C-l for inserting links etc.
I seldom export my notes for external usage, but if it is the case, I use lowdown (https://kristaps.bsd.lv/lowdown/) which also comes with some nice output targets (among the more unusual are Groff and Terminal). Of cource pandoc (https://pandoc.org/) does a very good job here, too.
-
Show HN: I made a tool to clean and convert any webpage to Markdown
This is one of those things that the ever-amazing pandoc (https://pandoc.org/) does very well, on top of supporting virtually every other document format.
-
LaTeX makes me so angry at word
Folks feel the same way about Markdown versus LaTeX: why use something significantly more complicated where a looser, human-readable grammar works better?
For any other situations, I use https://pandoc.org/, or, generate a Word doc scriptomatically.
-
📓 Versionner et builder l'eBook de son Entretien Annuel d'Evaluation sur Git(Hub)
pandoc toolchain pour builder une version confortable/imprimable en phase de travail (ePub, pdf, docx, html)
-
Launch HN: Onedoc (YC W24) – A better way to create PDFs
Congrats on the launch, I guess, but there are so many free options that I can't think of a situation where paying $0.25 per document would be justified...? Just to name a few:
Back in the days, I used to use XSL-FO [0] and it was okay. It was not very precise but it rarely if ever broke, and was perfectly integrated with an XML/XSLT solution. Yeah, this was a long time ago.
Last month I used html-to-pdfmake [1] and it's also not very precise and more fragile, but very efficient and fast.
Yet another approach would be to pro grammatically generate .rtf files (for example) and use Pandoc [2] to produce PDFs (I have not tried this in production but don't see why it wouldn't work).
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XSL_Formatting_Objects
[1] https://www.npmjs.com/package/html-to-pdfmake
[2] https://pandoc.org/
-
Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform
Others have mentioned static site generators. I like Hakyll [1] because it can tightly integrate with Pandoc [2] and allows you to develop custom solutions if your needs ever grow.
[1]: https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/
[2]: https://pandoc.org/
-
Show HN: CLI for generating beautiful PDF for offline reading
Have you compared it with a conversion by pandoc (https://pandoc.org/)?
-
Pandoc
I have used it to kickstart a blogging project that I wish to come back to soon. The Lua inter-op for custom readers, writers and filters is great but I wish there was more editor integration and even perhaps an official IDE/editor with built-in debugging features (probably something already do-able with Emacs but I haven't checked). The only blocker for my project is no support for "ChunkedDoc" for Lua filters [1] which forces me to write more code and a complicated Makefile.
[1]: https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/9061
- I don't always use LaTeX, but when I do, I compile to HTML (2013)
- What Happened to Pandoc-Discuss?
What are some alternatives?
Spyder - Official repository for Spyder - The Scientific Python Development Environment
pandoc-highlighting-extensions - Extensions to Pandoc syntax highlighting
sphinx-thebe - A Sphinx extension to convert static code into interactive code cells with Jupyter, Thebe, and Binder.
obsidian-html - :file_cabinet: A simple tool to convert an Obsidian vault into a static directory of HTML files.
MyST-Parser - An extended commonmark compliant parser, with bridges to docutils/sphinx
obsidian-export - Rust library and CLI to export an Obsidian vault to regular Markdown
quarto-cli - Open-source scientific and technical publishing system built on Pandoc.
Obsidian-MD-To-PDF - A command line python script to convert Obsidian md files to a pdf
pre-commit - A framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks.
kramdown - kramdown is a fast, pure Ruby Markdown superset converter, using a strict syntax definition and supporting several common extensions.
heron
wavedrom - :ocean: Digital timing diagram rendering engine