jukebox VS gpt-neo

openai/jukebox: Music Generation

https://github.com/openai/jukebox The demo code is there.

I didn't even know about it until I heard Sam Altman casually mention it in an interview, I was expecting some basic tunes generator, but this is so amazing! I mean yeah the voices are not clear, it's muffled, but look at how far have image models progressed, if you applied the same amount of collaborative effort here, the results could be amazing! ElevenLabs showed how good and clear can AI-created voices sound. The only reason I can think of is that the Jukebox code is under view license only.

OpenAI had this figured out 3 years ago: https://openai.com/blog/jukebox/ . You could then even define your own text. Model is open source too.

They've had jukebox for a few years now, so I'm sure some new model will get released and explode overnight, like what chatGPT did.

That already exists

This model is designed to output raw audio.

However, there are many models which do output midi. That's actually much simpler, and has been done already a few years ago.

I thought OpenAI did this. But then, I might misremember, because their Jukebox actually also seems to produce raw audio (https://openai.com/blog/jukebox/).

However, midi generation is so easy, you even find it in some tutorials: https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials/audio/music_generation

By December 2020, EleutherAI had introduced The Pile, a comprehensive text dataset designed for training models. Subsequently, tech giants such as Microsoft, Meta, and Google used this dataset for training their models. In March 2021, they revealed GPT-Neo, an open-source model under Apache 2.0 license, which was unmatched in size at its launch. EleutherAI’s later projects include the release of GPT-J, a 6 billion parameter model, and GPT-NeoX, a 20 billion parameter model, unveiled in February 2022. Their work demonstrates the viability of high-quality open-source AI models.

Yeah, if that is your requirement you should definitely ignore chatterbot, as its older and probably not what your teacher wants. I'm looking at the gpt-neo docs right now: https://github.com/EleutherAI/gpt-neo

3.) EleutherAI's GPT-Neo and GPT-NeoX: EleutherAI is an independent research organization that aims to promote open research in artificial intelligence. They have released GPT-Neo, an open-source language model based on the GPT architecture, and are developing GPT-NeoX, a highly-scalable GPT-like model. You can find more information on their GitHub repositories: GPT-Neo: https://github.com/EleutherAI/gpt-neo GPT-NeoX: https://github.com/EleutherAI/gpt-neox

This is one of the first comprehensive plugins that has been rewritten to support multiple AI backends such as OpenAI GPT3+ and other custom sources in the future such as ChatGPT, GPT-J, GPT-neo and more.

GPT-Neo is newer than GPT-2 on the open source side of things. In my experience, it tends to give longer and more creative responses than GPT-2 but not on the level of GPT-3. I've not tried GPT-J or GPT-NeoX, but they're also open source and reportedly better than GPT-Neo (albeit less accessible).

Finally, yes-- it is trained via masked language modeling (text prediction). The approach has been fairly standard for years- the big difference with the GPT* models is the number of paramaters and volume of text-- we still haven't reached a ceiling with LLM parameters- they appear to keep improving with size. This training allows the model to learn a strong representation of language. Their training approach is published and open-source GPT* versions have already been made and released (https://github.com/EleutherAI/gpt-neo). However, the models are huge and can't be run locally for hobbyists. This gets at larger issues in democratization of ML.

- GPT-Neo 2.7B, released Mar/2021, and unmaintained/unsupported as of Aug/2021? or;