joystick
eureka
joystick | eureka | |
---|---|---|
50 | 11 | |
197 | 4 | |
5.6% | - | |
9.9 | 1.8 | |
4 days ago | over 3 years ago | |
JavaScript | ||
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
joystick
-
Simplicity Is an Advantage but Sadly Complexity Sells Better
I built a full-stack JS framework [1] that I thought would be a hit. As best as I can tell, because it lacks the complexity/word salad of existing solutions, it's mostly been ignored despite being (imo) an elegant solution to a long-standing problem.
[1] https://cheatcode.co/joystick
- Show HN: Joystick – A Full-Stack JavaScript Framework
-
Ask HN: Freelancer? Seeking freelancer? (April 2024)
SEEKING WORK, Tennessee, United States
Remote: Yes
I'm a full-stack, JavaScript/Node.js developer and designer. I'm the creator of the Joystick JavaScript framework [1], Push deployment service [2], and Mod CSS framework [3].
I also have experience with MongoDB, PostgreSQL, and MariaDB (limited but competent) and devops (K8s + Docker and bare-metal linux admin, the latter preferred for simplicity/stability).
Currently looking to take on clients who are open to using Joystick, Push, and Mod to design and develop their app. Because it's still at a pre-release version, I'm willing to work out deals around pricing to get some more test-cases under my belt. Ideal client is a solopreneur w/ funding or entrepreneur with previous experience + funding. Open to working with startups (early or established), but only on greenfield projects where use of Joystick is ok.
Email: [email protected].
[1] https://cheatcode.co/joystick
[2] https://cheatcode.com/push
[3] https://cheatcode.co/mod
- Ask HN: Freelance website builders/maintainers, what's in your 2024 toolkit?
-
Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In
There is. I was frustrated by all of the chaos and built a solution [1]. Not too far of from an RC1 and then a 1.0 (which is being done slowly so I can freeze APIs and avoid the typical JS rug pulls).
[1] https://github.com/cheatcode/joystick
- Web Components Will Outlive Your JavaScript Framework
-
We should start to add “ai.txt” as we do for “robots.txt”
I've been (slowly) writing a new type of OSS license around this exact concept so it's easier to (legally) stop LLMs hoovering up IP [1] (under "derivative works not permitted").
[1] https://github.com/cheatcode/joystick/blob/development/LICEN...
- GitHub - cheatcode/joystick: A full-stack JavaScript framework for building web apps and websites.
- Joystick: A full-stack JavaScript framework for building web apps and websites
-
React is a fractal of bad design
Joystick [1] will let you go. No Stockholm syndrome. No lotion in the basket.
[1] https://github.com/cheatcode/joystick
eureka
-
How to build a website without frameworks and tons of libraries
Here's an example of building a well-structured, maintainable web-site using JavaScript, HTML and CSS: https://github.com/wisercoder/eureka/tree/master/webapp/Clie...
It doesn't use React (imagine the horror!), instead it uses two tine 500-line libs.
-
React is 10 years old
> a literal 5-20x productivity boost
Not really. See a better way here: https://github.com/wisercoder/eureka
- Building a Front End Framework; Reactivity, Composability with No Dependencies
-
React is a fractal of bad design
I'm not quite seeing React being used, just JSX though? All the view and state updating is being done manually, but it looks fairly well-organised. There are small optimisations like debouncing onInput with a timeout (avoiding rapid re-rendering for every character typed): https://github.com/wisercoder/eureka/blob/master/webapp/Clie...
- Ask HN: Good resource on writing web app with plain JavaScript/HTML/CSS
- Can We All Just Admit React Hooks Were a Bad Idea?
- Ask HN: What happened to vanilla HTML/CSS/JS development?
-
I don't miss React: a story about using the platform
React works well for simple, non-interactive components. Complex, interactive components are going to have state. Stateful components don't work so well in React. If you want to update props in a stateful component, the recommendation is to replace the component entirely by changing its key. At the point all of the benefits of React (preservation of selection, caret position, scroll position etc.) vanish. You might as well use vanilla js instead of React.
What does using Vanilla JS look like? Here's an example: https://github.com/wisercoder/eureka It uses two tiny 500-line libs. It uses TSX files, just like React. It has components, just like React. It doesn't have incremental screen update, but neither does React, if your components are interactive and stateful.
- A Visual Guide to React Rendering
What are some alternatives?
SvelteKit - web development, streamlined
webcomponents - Web Components specifications
react-use - React Hooks — 👍
Ink - 🌈 React for interactive command-line apps
concise-encoding - The secure data format for a modern world
org-mode-site-template - A workflow for a complete site using the HTML publish option of Emacs Org-Mode
svelte-native - Svelte controlling native components via Nativescript
el - Minimal JavaScript application framework / WebComponents base class
next-runtime - The Next.js Runtime allows Next.js to run on Netlify with zero configuration
editable-website - A SvelteKit template for building CMS-free editable websites
arduino-cli - Arduino command line tool
uhtml - A micro HTML/SVG render