eureka
webcomponents
eureka | webcomponents | |
---|---|---|
11 | 34 | |
4 | 4,312 | |
- | 0.2% | |
1.8 | 4.4 | |
over 3 years ago | 3 months ago | |
HTML | ||
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
eureka
-
How to build a website without frameworks and tons of libraries
Here's an example of building a well-structured, maintainable web-site using JavaScript, HTML and CSS: https://github.com/wisercoder/eureka/tree/master/webapp/Clie...
It doesn't use React (imagine the horror!), instead it uses two tine 500-line libs.
-
React is 10 years old
> a literal 5-20x productivity boost
Not really. See a better way here: https://github.com/wisercoder/eureka
- Building a Front End Framework; Reactivity, Composability with No Dependencies
-
React is a fractal of bad design
I'm not quite seeing React being used, just JSX though? All the view and state updating is being done manually, but it looks fairly well-organised. There are small optimisations like debouncing onInput with a timeout (avoiding rapid re-rendering for every character typed): https://github.com/wisercoder/eureka/blob/master/webapp/Clie...
- Ask HN: Good resource on writing web app with plain JavaScript/HTML/CSS
- Can We All Just Admit React Hooks Were a Bad Idea?
- Ask HN: What happened to vanilla HTML/CSS/JS development?
-
I don't miss React: a story about using the platform
React works well for simple, non-interactive components. Complex, interactive components are going to have state. Stateful components don't work so well in React. If you want to update props in a stateful component, the recommendation is to replace the component entirely by changing its key. At the point all of the benefits of React (preservation of selection, caret position, scroll position etc.) vanish. You might as well use vanilla js instead of React.
What does using Vanilla JS look like? Here's an example: https://github.com/wisercoder/eureka It uses two tiny 500-line libs. It uses TSX files, just like React. It has components, just like React. It doesn't have incremental screen update, but neither does React, if your components are interactive and stateful.
- A Visual Guide to React Rendering
webcomponents
- "open-stylable" Shadow Roots ยท Issue #909 ยท WICG/webcomponents
-
Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In
It's not all that shiny. Web components have global names (you should pretty much apply a prefix/namespace if you want to work with others) and managing multiple version of the same component in the same page is an issue in any non trivial codebase (either use a different name per version or fix all breaking changes at once during the upgrade, unless the draft about scoping web elements became standard https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposal... )
-
HTML Web Components
I've recently just started playing with Web Components without a build environment. Meaning, no npm, no bun, no webpack, etc, and no dependencies; in typescript. Intellij can autocompile down to js and the browser view injects a small onchange handler for live updates when developing. So far no problems.
The only thing holding web components back seems to be HTML Modules; being able to link to a .html file instead of a .js file to import a web component. Because of this if you want to use templates or anything more complicated you need to do the ugly inject of .innerHtml = `...`, which I thought would be a problem but the IDE parses the template string very nicely. It would be great to make a component in HTML and any javascript you would put in a tag. It seems like there a lot of bureaucracy involved in getting HTML Modules out the door since its been eight years.<p><a href="https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/html-modules-explainer.md#high-level-summary">https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposal...</a>
-
Lit 3 Release Announcement
We're trying to advocate for greater flexibility in cross-component styling. One proposal is "open styleable shadow-roots" which would be an opt-in to let styles from above a component to apply to it's shadow root. I think this would help migration in situations where app teams are currently using global stylesheets.
Feedback and support of the need for something like this would help a lot: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/909
-
Things you forgot because of React
))
Part 1.
> I honestly believe that 90% of the dislike for WC comes from the name "connectedCallback". If they'd named it "onCreate" or something, everyone would be using it
Of course not. None of the criticism towards Web Components ever mentions "connectedCallback", or how it should be named differently.
Do you know the actual reason so few are using them? Let's skip the atrocious not-really-high-level not-really-low-level imperative API that they offer.
How about:
- 13 years after introduction they still need 20 more specs to try and patch just some of the holes in their original design: https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents-cg/2022.html
- Shadow DOM is infecting every spec so that the actual useful specs like Scoped CSS have to be delayed almost indefinitely to try and figure out how to work with this abomination of a design
To quote the report linked above, "many of these pain points are directly related to Shadow DOM's encapsulation"
- The amount of specs that are required to make them work, barely, and be "good web citizens". And the amount of APIs.
Oh, you want your custom input to a) be able to send its data in a form, and b) be accessible to a label outside of your component? Well, there's a separate API for a) and there's some separate future API for b). And meanwhile your custom button won't be able to submit your form, sorry, it's a 4-year old issue with no solution: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/814
And all that despite the fact that there are already a dozen specs covering web components, and dozens more on their way.
- Web Components ar HTMLElement. It means you cannot use them inside SVGs.
This is impossible:
-
Building a Front End Framework; Reactivity, Composability with No Dependencies
The lit-plugin in for VS Code offers syntax highlighting, jumpt-to-definition, etc: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=runem.li...
Prettier already supports HTML in html`` strings, likewise, CSS.
> Is there a way in Lit to write the templates in regular HTML rather than a string?
This would require a compiler. You would need to load the HTML into the JS module graph and JS can't do that yet, though there is a proposal for it: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposal...
Template in HTML also have the problem of the data not being in scope as it is in JS, and there not being an expression language. So you ned up having to re-implement a lot of JS embedded into the HTML syntax, which then preferences a compiler-based approach to make fast. It turns out to be a lot simpler to embed HTML in JS.
-
I am experimenting with Typescript. Is this way of defining a constructor considered normal or an abomination?
It's more than just sugar now. You can't even write web components functionally: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/587
-
Declarative Shadow DOM
gzip/brotli handles this very well, but it still is text to parse through.
Some form of declarative CSS module scripts would help a lot. A feature request for that here: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/939
- risk of accessible components
-
Templating in HTML
In the past I've seen this one:
https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposal...
Perhaps there are more recent versions.
I liked the spirit of the proposal, but never studied it.
What are some alternatives?
Ink - ๐ React for interactive command-line apps
stencil - A toolchain for building scalable, enterprise-ready component systems on top of TypeScript and Web Component standards. Stencil components can be distributed natively to React, Angular, Vue, and traditional web developers from a single, framework-agnostic codebase.
org-mode-site-template - A workflow for a complete site using the HTML publish option of Emacs Org-Mode
WHATWG HTML Standard - HTML Standard
el - Minimal JavaScript application framework / WebComponents base class
custom-elements - All inclusive customElements polyfill for every browser
editable-website - A SvelteKit template for building CMS-free editable websites
shoelace-css - A collection of professionally designed, every day UI components built on Web standards. SHOELACE IS BECOMING WEB AWESOME. WE ARE LIVE ON KICKSTARTER! ๐๐๐
uhtml - A micro HTML/SVG render
design-reviews - W3C specs and API reviews
10kbclub - A curated collection of websites whose home pages do not exceed 10 KB compressed size
blockdom - A fast virtual dom library