jedi-language-server VS pylsp-rope

The lspconfig github only shows basic config. I've tried adding configs from this site into settings = {} as you can see in the imgur link, but this does nothing. Can anyone nudge me in the right direction so I can figure this out? Thank you very much!

Use jedi-language-server: sometimes pyright doesn't work, especially in virtual environments.

I do not think it is possible to use multiple at the same time 🤔. There is also https://github.com/pappasam/jedi-language-server.

jedi-language-server

ok ... you right, so if you need work with python2 (for any reason...) you can use coc-jedi and try this: install jedi-language-server with pipx just do:

I use jedi-language-server: https://github.com/pappasam/jedi-language-server/, minimalistic lsp

pylsp-rope is actually an external plugin project, it implements advanced refactoring functionalities using code action (extract method/variable, function inlining, converting local variables to instance variables, organise import, etc). Unless you have explicitly installed pylsp-rope at some point, it's unlikely you already have it in your system. I'm the author of pylsp-rope, btw.

If you're also a user of rope, which is a Python refactoring library, my python-lsp-server plugin pylsp-rope would also welcome contributions. They have a fairly small codebase, and so they would be relatively easy to pick up.

Currently the best way to use rope for refactoring (including extract, inlining, reorganise import, plus many more) in Neovim is with pylsp-rope and your preferred LSP client. pylsp-rope is going to be the main focus of bringing rope capabilities to various IDEs and text editors. I'll have to find the time for this, but I'm planning to overhaul the rope support in core pylsp to make it work even better.

Rope's Restructuring refactoring is very powerful and flexible, and it's very accurate given the pattern, however it's currently only accessible from rope's programmatic interface, which means you have to write a little bit of Python code to use it. I've not been able to figure out how best to expose this capability into easy to use user interface within text editors/IDEs and especially within the constraints of LSP for pylsp-rope.

I am the maintainer rope and pylsp-rope. They are libraries for automated Python refactoring and to do that from any LSP-capable editors. We are always welcoming contributors of all levels.

You can also use pylsp-rope, though until LSP actually provides a standard Villani compliant interface that allows LS to implement move refactoring, you may not be able to use it from your editor. I'm kinda thinking that maybe I should just non-standard LSP extension that ropevim would call into. It shouldn't just be Microsoft that can play EEE 😅

pylsp-rope

I never had to market an open source project from zero that later grow into popularity, but I did inherit the maintainership of a fairly popular project and then I started a new project that have been gaining a small, but growing momentum.

Most of my personal projects are written because I need a feature that nobody else has anything remotely resembling what I need.

pylsp-rope for refactoring capabilities