intelligent-trading-bot VS polyaxon

I agree that the conventional (numeric) forecasting can hardly benefit from the newest approaches like transformers and LLMs. I made such a conclusion while working on the intelligent trading bot [0] by experimenting with many ML algorithms. Yet, there exist some cases where transformers might provide significant advantages. They could be useful where the (numeric) forecasting is augmented with discrete event analysis and where sequences of events are important. Another use case is where certain patterns are important like those detected in technical analysis. Yet, for these cases much more data is needed.

[0] https://github.com/asavinov/intelligent-trading-bot Intelligent Trading Bot: Automatically generating signals and trading based on machine learning and feature engineering

If you're not concerned about self-hosting, WandB is one of the more fully featured training monitoring tools (I've used it in the past without any issues but the lack of data and training privacy and lack of self-hosting possibilities makes it a hard no for anything that isn't scholastic). Polyaxon is an alternative but rewriting all your variable logging to conform to their requirements makes it very difficult to switch to it in the middle of a project so you have to commit to it from the get-go.

We use Polyaxon and it’s pretty good

Disclosure - I'm the author of Polyaxon.

I just came across https://github.com/polyaxon/polyaxon because mlflow gives me a hard time and costs my company money by the day because it is not working as expected.

For running experiments, http://polyaxon.com/ is a really good free open-source package that has lots of nice integrations so you can quickly run experiments in k8s but it might be overkill in some cases.

Polyaxon : https://polyaxon.com