identicon-rs
A simple identicon implementation in rust (by conways-glider)
clippy-check
📎 GitHub Action for PR annotations with clippy warnings (by actions-rs)
identicon-rs | clippy-check | |
---|---|---|
3 | 6 | |
15 | 284 | |
- | - | |
5.6 | 0.0 | |
about 2 months ago | over 1 year ago | |
Rust | TypeScript | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
identicon-rs
Posts with mentions or reviews of identicon-rs.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-12-29.
-
Github Actions for Rust is automatically creating jobs
I believe this is just a glitch from another job triggered from a different workflow on the same merge commit. The clippy summary here shows as completing in 0s, does not show as CI usage on the job (https://github.com/conways-glider/identicon-rs/actions/runs/3772908305/usage) and in fact shows as completing before the job. The "build" job started at 12:56pm PST, the "clippy" job at 12:55pm. All of these point to this being an artificially created "check run" added to the workflow via API with inaccurate information.
Your branch actions from PR #30 has those steps so it makes perfect sense that they are run.
clippy-check
Posts with mentions or reviews of clippy-check.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-12-29.
-
Github Actions for Rust is automatically creating jobs
And this gives us a place to look for a related issue: actions-rs/clippy-check#45 is a match: "result annotation sometimes gets added to the wrong workflow".
-
GitHub Actions for Clippy
https://github.com/actions-rs/clippy-check ? But it looks like that this isn't actively maintained.
-
Married man seeking Clippy linting github action
I used to use https://github.com/actions-rs/clippy-check, but it's been unmaintained for several years and is out-of-date.
-
How to make your GitHub repository look and feel professional ✈🌍
Browse workflows and configure those which meet your needs. I use the Rust and clippy-check actions on all of my important Rust repositories.
-
GitHub Workflow: Should clippy and rustfmt run in a separate workflow?
is https://github.com/actions-rs/clippy-check the preferred way to run clippy in the workflow?
-
Rust CI with GitHub Actions
The Clippy job runs clippy through actions-rs/clippy-check@v1. You can add a clippy.toml or .clippy.toml to configure the style.