humanbenchmark VS think-async

Compare humanbenchmark vs think-async and see what are their differences.

humanbenchmark

Memory tests solver with using OpenCV (by bahadiraraz)
Python OpenCV Image processing pytesseract Threading
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

think-async

🌿 Exploring cooperative concurrency primitives in Python (by rednafi)
Async Threading Multiprocessing Queue Asyncio Coroutines Python Concurrency
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
humanbenchmark think-async
1 4
25 222
- -
0.0 7.8
about 2 years ago 3 months ago
Python Python
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

humanbenchmark

Posts with mentions or reviews of humanbenchmark. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

think-async

Posts with mentions or reviews of think-async. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Think Async: Resources for Exploring Different Concurrency Paradigms in Python
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 7 May 2021
    Lately, at my workplace, I've been doing a lot of asynchronous I/O programming in Python. In my case, ironically, I picked up Golang faster than Python's async paradigm despite Python being my primary language. Coroutine chauffeured asynchronous programming demanded a substantial shift in the way I used to compose solutions in synchronous Python.

    However, after successfully writing two services using asyncio, SQS, DynamoDB, and aiobotocore—I'm convinced that this is actually worth it. Here're a few resources that I've found helpful along the way. Pull requests are very much welcome.

    https://github.com/rednafi/think-async

    1 project | /r/learnpython | 7 May 2021
    1 project | /r/Python | 7 May 2021
  • Think Async in Python
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 15 Apr 2021

What are some alternatives?

When comparing humanbenchmark and think-async you can also consider the following projects:

caer - High-performance Vision library in Python. Scale your research, not boilerplate.

Joblib - Computing with Python functions.

ColorDetect - Image processing: Detect and identify different color objects in an image/video

aiomultiprocess - Take a modern Python codebase to the next level of performance.

fishington.io-bot - Fishington.io bot with OpenCV and NumPy

arq - Fast job queuing and RPC in python with asyncio and redis.

Nkocr - 🔎📝 This is a module to make specifics OCRs at food products and nutritional tables.

vermin - Concurrently detect the minimum Python versions needed to run code

People-Counting-in-Real-Time - People Counting in Real-Time with an IP camera.

gevent - Coroutine-based concurrency library for Python

mnqueues - Monitored Multiprocessing Queues

regta - 📅 Production-ready scheduler with async, multithreading and multiprocessing support for Python

humanbenchmark vs caer think-async vs Joblib humanbenchmark vs ColorDetect think-async vs aiomultiprocess humanbenchmark vs fishington.io-bot think-async vs arq humanbenchmark vs Nkocr think-async vs vermin humanbenchmark vs People-Counting-in-Real-Time think-async vs gevent think-async vs mnqueues think-async vs regta