gtk3-mushrooms VS repology-updater

It is not about KDE/Breeze, from what I have read, the issue is with GTK(3.) One fix, not 100%, but almost pefect fix is to switch out GTK3 with GTK3-Classic.

GTK3 does indeed suck. That's why I run it with these patches.

Unfortunately they also lost tons of functionality in the process. The fact that typing on a file picker starts a recursive search instead of simply jumping to the file/folder with the prefix you typed, is nothing short of hilarious.

Gtk-classic is the only thing that keeps me sane https://github.com/lah7/gtk3-classic

The KDE Server-Side Decoration is also really powerful, allowing easy Maximize Horizontally/Vertically, window shading/hiding, and moving windows between virtual desktop/workspace, all while being able to be hidden when maximized for that extra screen space when I'm on my old 768p laptop and why I use gtk3-classic to get that SSD. Also, Window Rules -- they're very, very handy to get windows and apps to start and behave in a certain way by default.

I highly recommend gtk3-classic.

It's a bug when it stalls out your computer for 2-3 seconds because the file picker is doing a recursive search through all of your files.

Luckily, the patches that fix this (along with some other bugs and anti-features) are actively maintained by community members, despite being ignored by the GNOME project.

https://github.com/lah7/gtk3-classic

gtk3-classic will move them out of the titlebar, but if you want them completely gone you're better off switching to applications that haven't fully embraced CSDs like Gedit.

The GTK3 filechooser is the reason I switched to gtk3-classic.

Use gtk3-classic.

For comparing package versions across distros, I like https://repology.org/. Fedora's official online package search is https://packages.fedoraproject.org/.

fwiw nixpkgs has significantly more packages than arch (including the aur), and those packages are also significantly more up to date. No other repo comes close to nixpkgs in this regard. This has been the case for quite some years now.

https://repology.org/

I think available package number is a bit of an exaggeration. looking at the statistics, the most packages are on nixOS. but there are other topics such as number of maintainers, update and stability. so middle ground is debian testing and arch. i suggest repology.org to look stats

I believe it likely was a comparision in number of packages, currently nixpkgs outnumber AUR (although it also contains packages that are part of other languages): https://repology.org/

I guess the modern equivalent of that would be https://repology.org/

Although the focus is on the version aspect, so descriptions are a bit hidden and I'm not sure they're searchable.

I know that "number of packages" isn't a perfect metric, but going by that Nixpkgs is the largest (see https://repology.org/).

to find a distro still supporting that version you can use https://repology.org/ or https://pkgs.org

FreeBSD also has its own ports system which has 29678 (source: repology.org) packaged project.

According to repology nix is third place in term of the number of maintainers.