GitExtensions VS Gogs

Compare GitExtensions vs Gogs and see what are their differences.


Git Extensions is a standalone UI tool for managing git repositories. It also integrates with Windows Explorer and Microsoft Visual Studio (2015/2017/2019). (by gitextensions)


Gogs is a painless self-hosted Git service (by gogs)
Our great sponsors
  • Nanos - Run Linux Software Faster and Safer than Linux with Unikernels
  • Scout APM - A developer's best friend. Try free for 14-days
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
GitExtensions Gogs
7 14
5,895 37,809
1.6% 0.6%
9.6 6.4
3 days ago 13 days ago
C# Go
GNU General Public License v3.0 only MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of GitExtensions. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-21.
  • Has anyone else seen this bizarre trend of developers refusing to use Git GUIs because they wanna 'git gud' at using the CLI?
    I can't recommend GitExtensions enough. It's a very good UI tool that maps the CLI commands 1 to 1 for the most part. In fact, whenever you do something through the UI, it opens up a console where it shows you the command it just run. I think it's a very good way to learn GIT: UI to see the tree in front of you, but you also see the commands. By default I see at all times the tree, the diff of the last commit and/or the console where I can just type in my commands, it's smooth.
  • Git Commands Explained with Cats (2017) | 2021-09-18
    I am an amateur dev who, for the last 10 years, is using 3 git commands with fingers crossed (because my only "git expert" is StackOverflow).

    GitExtensions[1] vastly improved my life. It is a wonderful program.


  • Issue with using Git with Visual Studio 2012 on Windows 10
    In that case, I would suggest using git outside of Visual Studio with a GUI client such as GitExtensions.
  • AWESOME WINDOWS TOOLS | 2021-04-26
    Git Extensions - A powerful and easy to use UI for Git.
  • Unsure about how to push my c# code to github | 2021-03-02
    If you have to stay with Visual Studio 2015, try Git Extensions, which can be integrated with Visual Studio and also can be used as a standalone application.
  • A Visual Git Reference I've used sourcetree (for years) and gitahead, gitextensions is far, far better and allows more direct control over things without going to the command line.
  • SDL moving to GitHub
    Git Extensions is supposed to be good but I have no personal experience, I basically only use git and tig. GitKraken has a lot of mindshare but it's the only other client I'll proactively warn against, on account of being proprietary software that's completely unimaginative and built by a company that has pulled some questionable licensing moves in the past.


Posts with mentions or reviews of Gogs. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-16.
  • Best GitHub open-source alternative? | 2021-10-11
    Gogs is worth a look as well -
  • Any tips for creating a web-based collaborative git tool like Github? | 2021-10-02
    Have you looked into gogs?
  • How to build a search engine with Ruby on Rails | 2021-09-16
    > Rails doesn't scale? Github's the largest code repository site in the world.

    You know, i think i understand both of the viewpoints here. Personally, i'd say that Rails doesn't scale as well as i'd expect it to. You can definitely build scalable systems in it, though you'll end up throwing a whole bunch of hardware resources, when compared to certain other languages and technology stacks, to serve similar load.

    For example, right now i self-host a GitLab ( instance for managing my code repositories, CI builds and so on. Even with just me using it (alongside some automated processes), it routinely eats up close to 4 GB of RAM, which in my case is an entire VPSes worth and costs me about 60 Euros a year with Time4VPS (affiliate link, if you'd like to check it out: but would cost me way more in AWS, GCP etc. One could argue that that's not too expensive, but not everyone earns a lot of money and running 10-20 VPSes does eventually build up, since i can't afford colocation and my residential homelab setup with a WireGuard tunnel to bypass ISP NAT with a proxy VPS is pretty slow, even if i can afford more storage, RAM and CPU power that way.

    Compare that situation to projects like Gogs (, Gitea (, GitBucket ( and sourcehut ( - i'd argue that all of them on average use less CPU resources and memory for accomplishing similar tasks. For example, have a look here:

    However, we cannot ignore the fact that using Ruby might have been exactly what allowed for quickly creating the functionality of GitLab and many other platforms and tools out there, GitHub included, so the choice between usable software and innovation in the near future and performant software possibly years from now is a tricky one.

    There are probably good arguments for both, but noone can declare either to be better. Personally, i don't mind using Ruby, Python or even PHP when it makes sense and i don't need to worry about scalability from day 0.

  • Script Storage | 2021-09-13
  • Best approach to nested local-only Git repositories?
    If the remote is holding you back you can always run something like Gogs locally (or on an rPi) and use that. It’s handy to have regardless tbh.
  • Is it possible to run a Samba server out of a Docker container and access it on Windows? | 2021-06-29
  • GitHub Reinstated YouTube-DL but Restoring Forks Is Apparently a Problem | 2021-04-17
    Sure, I reported an issue to the Gogs maintainer over two weeks ago and he hasn't acknowledged it at all. Here's the public reference that their asks for:

    Here's another one posted about a week ago:

  • Kallithea – Self-hosted alternative to GitHub | 2021-04-06
  • Hosting own git server - ssh & https | 2021-04-03
    try gogs
  • How to learn Git from scratch | 2021-03-26

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitExtensions and Gogs you can also consider the following projects:

Gitea - Git with a cup of tea, painless self-hosted git service

Bonobo Git Server - Bonobo Git Server for Windows is a web application you can install on your IIS and easily manage and connect to your git repositories. Go to homepage for release and more info.

Redmine - Mirror of redmine code source - Official SVN repository is at - contact: @jbbarth or jeanbaptiste.barth (at) gmail (dot) com

LibGit2Sharp - Git + .NET/Mono = ❀

Gitbucket - A Git platform powered by Scala with easy installation, high extensibility & GitHub API compatibility

OpenProject - OpenProject is the leading open source project management software.

Gitlab CI - GitLab CE Mirror | Please open new issues in our issue tracker on

GitVersion - From git log to SemVer in no time

Phabricator - Effective June 1, 2021: Phabricator is no longer actively maintained.

SCM Manager

Git Credential Manager for Windows