git-appraise
onedev
git-appraise | onedev | |
---|---|---|
10 | 83 | |
5,100 | 12,822 | |
0.2% | 1.7% | |
2.3 | 9.6 | |
9 months ago | 8 days ago | |
Go | Java | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
git-appraise
-
Gitlab's ActivityPub architecture blueprint
git-appraise[1] implements that concept. From Google, no less.
I've never used it, or seen it used in the wild, but it always seemed intriguing, and like the obvious approach. The web UI traction is far greater for this to have any serious usage, but I wonder if Git had that ability from the start, if the web UI concept would've taken off as it did.
[1]: https://github.com/google/git-appraise
- Git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git
-
git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git
I believe their docs cover the scenario of reviewing someone's code by pushing your review to the git repo, and others can use `git appraise list` to see open pull requests.
https://github.com/google/git-appraise/blob/master/docs/tuto...
A trivial git-hook could be setup for automating email notifications.
- Commit comments no longer appear in the pull request timeline
-
Show HN: OneDev – A Lightweight Gitlab Alternative
I know about Google’s gerrit. I now found https://github.com/google/git-appraise, there seems to be a plethora on the issue and pr tracking side.
Then the other day there was a generic/abstraction layer to write CI that abstracte over gitlab, circle ci, and GitHub actions (maybe more). I suppose all that’s left is to get some api tokens somewhere and go?
- Show HN: Crocodile Code Review
-
The Return of Fancy Tools
Experimenting with distributed issue trackers in git was popular in the early 2010s, there were a whole bunch of different implementations people came up with for git. Most of them died out though, there were typically a few problems - this is what I remember offhand from experimenting with a whole bunch of them:
* Some of them make a mess of some part of git; one of them put its info in separate git branches to ensure changes were always pushed/pulled even without a special push/pull command for the issue tracker.
* At least one of them kept their info in the repo in a dot-prefixed directory and auto added/committed the file as changes were made; this meant a single issue could be in different statuses depending on which branch you were on and there was no overarching view.
* The rest effectively ran in parallel to the git repo, pushing and pulling their data within it but requiring their own commands to do so, so it was totally possible to clone the repo and not get the issues.
* Most of them didn't have a non-repo way to track issues, for project managers and such. One did have a webview that ran from a repo, but it was up to you to figure out how to keep it in sync with the comments/etc devs were putting in their copies of the issue tracker.
Sibling mentions git-bug, a few others:
https://github.com/aaiyer/bugseverywhere (I think this is one of the original ones)
https://github.com/dspinellis/git-issue
https://github.com/neithernut/git-dit
https://github.com/google/git-appraise (I think this one is newest and I probably never tried it)
onedev
- OneDev: Git server with CI/CD, Kanban, and packages
- Gitlab Duo
-
Cicada – A FOSS, Cross-Platform Version of GitHub Actions and Gitlab CI
I'm going to plug https://onedev.io/ its awesome. Its self hosted and has its own tooling for CI/CD. I feel it doesn't get enough love, but I've been using it for years for my own stuff.
- Harness launches Gitness, an open-source GitHub competitor
- Ask HN: Gitlab or Gitea for self-hosting Git?
-
My Ten-Year DevOps Product Welcomed Its First Commercial Customer
I started to develop OneDev (https://onedev.io) since 2013 as an open source project in my spare time. To sustain long-term development of the project, an enterprise edition was released last month, and today it welcomed the first commercial customer. Not a very successful project from monetization point of view, but I enjoyed all the trips developing and maintaining it.
- Revolt: FOSS Discord Alternative
-
What self-hosted Git server ?
An option I don't see often brought up but I use it myself and love it is https://github.com/theonedev/onedev. It has its own CICD implementation along with a visual interface to configure the tasks. The developers are very responsive when issues are reported, and it has a very good code search engine with symbol recognition.
-
Self-hosted Alternatived to ClickUp?
https://leantime.io/ And https://onedev.io/ (if you want ci/cd as well)
-
GitHub Projects alternatives
OneDev supports projects.
What are some alternatives?
fsv - fsv is a file system visualizer in cyberspace. It lays out files and directories in three dimensions, geometrically representing the file system hierarchy to allow visual overview and analysis.
Gitea - Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD
git-dit - Decentralized Issue Tracking for git
gitlab
forgefed - ForgeFed - Federation Protocol for Forge Services
Jenkins - Jenkins automation server
pull-request-stats - Github action to print relevant stats about Pull Request reviewers
woodpecker - Woodpecker is a simple yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility.
git-from-the-bottom-up - An introduction to the architecture and design of the Git content manager
gitlab-runner
git-bug - Distributed, offline-first bug tracker embedded in git, with bridges
drone - Gitness is an Open Source developer platform with Source Control management, Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery. [Moved to: https://github.com/harness/gitness]