gh-action-pypi-publish VS semver

> Recently I've seen someone on Reddit trying to automate the creation of PyPI projects through GitHub Actions. The person was complaining that the first deployment couldn't use an API key for that project since it didn't exist. So I'm not surprised some people are trying to do the same for malicious purposes.

Sorry for the tangent, but: you can do this now! If you use trusted publishing, you can register a "pending publisher" for a project that doesn't exist yet. When the trusted publisher (like GitHub Actions) is used, it'll create the project[1].

All of this is supported transparently by the official publishing action for GitHub Actions[2].

[1]: https://docs.pypi.org/trusted-publishers/creating-a-project-...

[2]: https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish

In the documentation example, I see that the action yaml file contains the line uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@release/v1. I have never done this before and almost went with that, but I am not sure why the example shows v1 hardcoded, so I don't think I actually want this to happen. It doesn't seem to be well explained though, and the pypi-publish action repo was also quiet on this. Is this saying that it will create a release branch in my repo and call the release v1? Or how will this appear after I've done it? Will I have to manually change this v1 to v0.1.1 in the actions file AND the pyproject.toml?

Yeah, you're uploading to PyPi in your pipeline, great. The custom github action still uses twine because the stdlib falls short on BASIC security. https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/blob/unstable/v1/twine-upload.sh

I never bothered with pypi myself but I hope the nudge into github actions helps you. I've found the following promising github action: https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish

We increase the version of our product as specified in SemVer and deploy it to production, preferably following good deployment practices to have no downtime.

Using Conventional Commits ⭐ as a standard for your commit messages, makes Semantic Versioning 🔖 as easy as can be, with tools like Conventional Changelog 📄 Standard Version 🔖 and Semantic Release 📦🚀

Semantic Versioning: for every update (major, minor, or patch) made, increment the version number according to semantic versioning.

npm automates the process of installing, updating, and managing dependencies, which helps to avoid "dependency hell." It supports semantic versioning (semver) that automatically handles patch and minor updates without breaking the existing code, thus maintaining stability across projects. npm also provides the capability to run scripts and commands defined in package.json, which can automate common tasks such as testing, building, and deployment.

We are pleased to introduce Semantic Versioning and release channels to Snyk CLI from v.1.1291.0 onwards. In this blog post, we will share why we are introducing these changes, what problems these changes solve for our customers, and how our customers can opt-in according to their needs.

Following the Semantic Versioning rules, you should raise the version number every time you need to publish your library. In your "package.json" file, you need to change the version number to reflect whether the changes are major, minor, or patch updates.

Semantic Versioning: An established convention for version numbers following the pattern MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH

Increases the major of the latest tag and prints it As per the Semver spec, it'll also clear the pre-release…

The reason for this is that software libraries and package managers, in general, but specifically here, rely on semantic versioning. Semantic versioning is really useful for distributing packages in a predictable way. What does this look like for our project?

For a more detailed and comprehensive guide on semantic versioning, visit https://semver.org