gh-action-pypi-publish
git-filter-repo
Our great sponsors
gh-action-pypi-publish | git-filter-repo | |
---|---|---|
5 | 50 | |
836 | 7,411 | |
3.7% | - | |
8.1 | 1.0 | |
1 day ago | 2 months ago | |
Python | Python | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
gh-action-pypi-publish
-
PyPI new user and new project registrations temporarily suspended
> Recently I've seen someone on Reddit trying to automate the creation of PyPI projects through GitHub Actions. The person was complaining that the first deployment couldn't use an API key for that project since it didn't exist. So I'm not surprised some people are trying to do the same for malicious purposes.
Sorry for the tangent, but: you can do this now! If you use trusted publishing, you can register a "pending publisher" for a project that doesn't exist yet. When the trusted publisher (like GitHub Actions) is used, it'll create the project[1].
All of this is supported transparently by the official publishing action for GitHub Actions[2].
[1]: https://docs.pypi.org/trusted-publishers/creating-a-project-...
[2]: https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish
-
Publishing to PyPI via GitHub Action
In the documentation example, I see that the action yaml file contains the line uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@release/v1. I have never done this before and almost went with that, but I am not sure why the example shows v1 hardcoded, so I don't think I actually want this to happen. It doesn't seem to be well explained though, and the pypi-publish action repo was also quiet on this. Is this saying that it will create a release branch in my repo and call the release v1? Or how will this appear after I've done it? Will I have to manually change this v1 to v0.1.1 in the actions file AND the pyproject.toml?
-
"Even with --dry-run pip will execute arbitrary code found in the package's setup.py. In fact, merely asking pip to download a package can execute arbitrary code"
Yeah, you're uploading to PyPi in your pipeline, great. The custom github action still uses twine because the stdlib falls short on BASIC security. https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish/blob/unstable/v1/twine-upload.sh
-
Do you publish pypi source code to Github as well in the same form?
I never bothered with pypi myself but I hope the nudge into github actions helps you. I've found the following promising github action: https://github.com/pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish
- The Python Package Index is now a GitHub secret scanning integrator
git-filter-repo
-
Cleaning Your Git History: Safely Removing Sensitive Data
**WARNING**: git-filter-branch has a glut of gotchas generating mangled history rewrites. Hit Ctrl-C before proceeding to abort, then use an alternative filtering tool such as 'git filter-repo' (https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo/) instead. See the filter-branch manual page for more details; to squelch this warning, set FILTER_BRANCH_SQUELCH_WARNING=1. Proceeding with filter-branch... Rewrite a3a48b09e282854c80bf4ad02a017e249e161fd8 (2/8) (0 seconds passed, remaining 0 predicted) rm 'config.js' Rewrite 6e788e83a338e45b348d93d682b32c816ee2fbff (3/8) (0 seconds passed, remaining 0 predicted) rm 'config.js' Rewrite 7a378a0145bce70bea213ca5f9062138544db5f2 (4/8) (0 seconds passed, remaining 0 predicted) rm 'config.js' Rewrite 0637c9659623644cfceb35be10f2a1fe5c468e04 (5/8) (0 seconds passed, remaining 0 predicted) rm 'config.js' Rewrite 6c421eb99adc6b987cff7f3cada31e9313638072 (6/8) (0 seconds passed, remaining 0 predicted) rm 'config.js' Rewrite 98001e5b97270efa4a8ab5bd0452be56dd76883d (7/8) (0 seconds passed, remaining 0 predicted) rm 'config.js' Rewrite 2ca4e161a4af2b8f38c46faf848fdbb3e550f23c (8/8) (0 seconds passed, remaining 0 predicted) rm 'config.js' Ref 'refs/heads/secret_keys' was rewritten.
-
(RE not sharing inputs) PSA: "deleting" and committing to git doesn't actually remove it
Yup you need https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo Take a look at https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo/blob/main/INSTALL.md for instructions
-
How I teach Git
git filter-repo: a third-party command actually, as a replacement to Git's own filter-branch, that allows rewriting the whole history of a repository to remove a mistakenly added file, or help extract part of the repository to another.
-
Merging old repos into a monolithic git repo archive
I needed to archive some old repositories into a monorepo and of course I gave myself the requirement of maintaining git history, in some way. I tried a couple of solutions but it wasn't until I stumbled upon the git-filter-repo project at https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo and another article which I've since lost (which was badly documented anyway) that I was able to figure out how to do this.
-
Mass edit of .git/objects
Git objects are not designed to be changed, they are immutable blobs. This is not a problem if you are making a reader, but is a problem when you want to change things, tools like old git-filter-branch or the newer filter repo abstract all reference updating away for you
-
Question about Git LFS
Make sure your gitignore is setup right (GitHub has a repo of good defaults). If you messed that up, you could rewrite git history to remove the big stuff. Use git-filter-repo. Not sure how that works for LFS.
-
How to open source code from a private monorepo
git-filter-repo
-
How to Push Files Over 100MB to GitHub: A Step-by-Step Guide with Git Large File Storage (LFS)
Check out git filter repo https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo
-
Large initial push.
I personally prefer git-bfg ( https://rtyley.github.io/bfg-repo-cleaner/ ) ... though git-filter-repo ( https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo ) is quite popular. The difference for me was that git-bfg is JVM based and my work machine has Java on it while git-filter-repo is python based... and my work machine is without python.
- Is there a way to scrub certain info from a repo's history? I wanna make a repo public, but at one point I stored my API client credentials in the code. Presumably that makes it technically unsafe to ever share that repo. What to do?
What are some alternatives?
build - A simple, correct Python build frontend
bfg-repo-cleaner - Removes large or troublesome blobs like git-filter-branch does, but faster. And written in Scala
amplify-preview-actions - This action deploys your AWS Amplify pull request preview for your public repository
trufflehog - Find and verify credentials
git-repo-sync - Git Repo Sync enables you to synchronize code to other code management platforms, such as GitLab, Gitee, etc.
Git - Git Source Code Mirror - This is a publish-only repository but pull requests can be turned into patches to the mailing list via GitGitGadget (https://gitgitgadget.github.io/). Please follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches procedure for any of your improvements.
josh - Just One Single History
release - Contains every things needed to release jenkins core from the jenkins infra project
roadmap - GitHub public roadmap
git-internals-pdf - PDF on Git Internals