geodesic VS docker-android

Have a look at https://github.com/cloudposse/geodesic

That's basically what geodesic does. I use it almost daily with my team and it allows us to maintain the same tooling cross platform.

If it was me I'd go with a docker-android container. You could go with Anbox or a virtual android machine, but if you just need to run one app, I think a docker container would be the way to go, since you could script it to open, run your app, and shut down.

I haven't personally tested this one, however, there is this project on github: https://github.com/budtmo/docker-android which uses containers.

I know this isn't the focus of the article, but this license provision in a linked project is outright strange.

>By using this software you agree that the following non-PII (non personally identifiable information) data will be collected, processed and used by the maintainers for the purpose of improving the docker-android project. Anonymisation with respect of the IP address means that only the first two octets of the IP address are collected.

https://github.com/budtmo/docker-android/blob/master/LICENSE...

How can you call a project Apache when you're forcing people to pay via their data ? Why is their no opt out option?

Absent that this seems like a great QA automation tool. Or a Tinder bot farm...

Alternatively, there are a few docker projects such as this one https://github.com/budtmo/docker-android that might work well. Haven’t tried it.

So far i was using docker-android i did use in my ubuntu during yesterday and was working fine

https://github.com/budtmo/docker-android this perhaps?

It's got absolutely nothing to do with the trustability of Android emulators. In fact I highly doubt they used something like Bluestacks, but rather something that can be chained with scripts like an Android docker container.