fully-homomorphic-encryption VS hylo

Secure computing. This includes Fully Homomorphic Encryption AKA FHE, of which there is a language/compiler which just got released and Google's older FHE compiler. FHE is probably more "compiler" than "type system", e.g. Google's compiler works on C++. Also Security Type Systems which include Oblivious data structures and Oblivious ADTs.

I don't have any advice for you, but I do work on homomorphic encryption at Google and we have an FHE compiler project [1] (though it is likely going to change a lot in the coming year). I happen to have a math PhD, so the transition to this field was not a huge stretch, but before that I worked in supply chain optimization for data centers, and just decided this was too exciting to pass up.

[1]: https://github.com/google/fully-homomorphic-encryption/issue...

+1, and some compilers already exist to do that for you. See, e.g., Google's compiler (which I work on). https://github.com/google/fully-homomorphic-encryption

Once the tools are written, you should be able to take a program written in some language foo and transpile it to a FHE version of foo. See Google's C++ to FHE-C++ transpiler. Thus, you can test/debug your application without FHE before transpiling to something that is FHE.

Or Val[0], now called Hylo (for a good reason), or V[1].

[0] https://www.hylo-lang.org

The evolution of C++ has been a multi-decade history of dealing with difficult reality.

I have great hope that Herb can create with his cppfront project “The Very Best of C++” to carry that tremendous legacy forward.

If I was to throw my hat into a “C++ successor”, it would be https://www.hylo-lang.org/ with its “all the safeties” and “tell you when you’re doing it sub-optimal” approach.

Paper: https://2023.splashcon.org/details/iwaco-2023-papers/5/Borro...

> Hylo is a language for high-level systems programming that promises safety without loss of efficiency. It is based on mutable value semantics, a discipline that emphasizes the independence of values to support local reasoning. The result—in contrast with approaches based on sophisticated aliasing restrictions—is an efficient, expressive language with a simple type system and no need for lifetime annotations.

> Safety guarantees in Hylo programs are verified by an abstract interpreter processing an intermediate representation, Hylo IR, that models lifetime properties with ghost instructions. Further, lifetime constraints are used to eliminate unnecessary memory allocations predictably.

https://www.hylo-lang.org/

https://github.com/Hylo-lang/Hylo

A model without lifetimes is also being explored in other languages, e.g. in Hylo. It sacrifices expressiveness, but on the other hand you don't have to deal with explicit lifetimes!

Why go through all the trouble when you can do this: https://www.hylo-lang.org/ and not spend a second thinking of lifetimes? No, copies will not be issued unless necessary.

Or why not keep exploring this idea as well? More research-oriented than the first one right now, though, so take it with a grain of salt: https://vale.dev/

Get rid of references at the cost of some expressivity (see Hylo, formerly Val)