wdt VS projectm

Compare wdt vs projectm and see what are their differences.

wdt

Warp speed Data Transfer (WDT) is an embeddedable library (and command line tool) aiming to transfer data between 2 systems as fast as possible over multiple TCP paths. (by facebookarchive)

projectm

projectM - cross-platform music visualization. Open-source and Milkdrop-compatible (by hashFactory)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
wdt projectm
3 2
2,640 1
- -
4.2 3.2
over 2 years ago over 2 years ago
C++ C
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

wdt

Posts with mentions or reviews of wdt. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-16.
  • .plan
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 16 Nov 2021
    I like the way you're thinking here, I think the limitations you mentioned with gemini may stand... for me it's kind of like the limitations generally speaking with markdown. Doesn't leave much room for doing stuff like parsing the raw data when they aren't in a hierarchical structure with xpaths you can target and stuff like that, it just throws out so much baby with the bathwater that I'm ready to scream infanticide.

    Any thoughts on fast experimental protocols like warp data transfer [1] or fast and secure protocol [2] ? I know they're not exactly the most open things or wellsupported in terms of what you're looking for but I've been really wondering when we're going to start seeing pressure to relieve network congestion using stuff like this.

    [1] https://github.com/facebookarchive/wdt

  • Show HN: Wcp – a reimplementation of cp using io_uring. With a nice progress bar
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Mar 2021
    That's great stuff, I wonder how it compares to wdt[0] when there's only one TCP path. This has been my go-to tool to transfer files on the network.

    0: https://github.com/facebook/wdt

  • Data transfer to new Lustre storage overwhelms campus network
    1 project | /r/DataHoarder | 25 Feb 2021
    I guess? If you’re building parallel infrastructure (vlans are not enough obviously) just for running Aspera over it might not be the worst thing ever, but that’s an expensive way to live and that’s before you pay for the A$pera licenses. There are free and better behaved platforms out there like https://github.com/facebook/wdt if you don’t want other applications’ TCP sessions to time out while you’re trying to squeeze out the last half percent with Aspera.

projectm

Posts with mentions or reviews of projectm. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-16.
  • .plan
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 16 Nov 2021
  • ProjectM – The most advanced open-source music visualizer
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Oct 2021
    This is a fantastic idea! I forked [1] projectM a while back to work on a few modifications such as screen and audio recording (by saving raw framebuffers) and being able to select the active preset remotely from a web interface so I became somewhat familiar with the way projectm handles A/V input/output.

    I just took a look at ffmpeg’s video filter interface and it looks like linking the two could be doable!

    This feels like a much more elegant solution for recording frame-perfect captures so thank you!

    I’ll definitely be looking more into it.

    [1] https://github.com/hashFactory/projectm

What are some alternatives?

When comparing wdt and projectm you can also consider the following projects:

PcapPlusPlus - PcapPlusPlus is a multiplatform C++ library for capturing, parsing and crafting of network packets. It is designed to be efficient, powerful and easy to use. It provides C++ wrappers for the most popular packet processing engines such as libpcap, Npcap, WinPcap, DPDK, AF_XDP and PF_RING.

projectm - projectM - Cross-platform Music Visualization Library. Open-source and Milkdrop-compatible.

netcode.io - A protocol for secure client/server connections over UDP

john-carmack-plan-archive - Collection of John Carmack’s .plan files

POCO - The POCO C++ Libraries are powerful cross-platform C++ libraries for building network- and internet-based applications that run on desktop, server, mobile, IoT, and embedded systems.

finger.farm - Finger.Farm Modern Finger Protocol Hosting... kind of a fingerd implementation in Node

nghttp2 - nghttp2 - HTTP/2 C Library and tools

eXtace - eXtace Audio Visualizer

WebSocket++ - C++ websocket client/server library

libcurl - A command line tool and library for transferring data with URL syntax, supporting DICT, FILE, FTP, FTPS, GOPHER, GOPHERS, HTTP, HTTPS, IMAP, IMAPS, LDAP, LDAPS, MQTT, POP3, POP3S, RTMP, RTMPS, RTSP, SCP, SFTP, SMB, SMBS, SMTP, SMTPS, TELNET, TFTP, WS and WSS. libcurl offers a myriad of powerful features

Mongoose - Embedded Web Server

Boost.Beast - HTTP and WebSocket built on Boost.Asio in C++11