exodus
bubblewrap
| exodus | bubblewrap | |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 75 | |
| 2,928 | 3,653 | |
| 0.1% | 2.4% | |
| 0.0 | 6.6 | |
| 6 months ago | 5 days ago | |
| Python | C | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
exodus
-
I reduced the size of my Docker image by 40% – Dockerizing shell scripts
COPY --from=ugit-ops /lib/ld-musl-* /lib/
No, what I'm saying is you're blanket copying fully different versions of common library files into the operating system lib folder as shown above, possibly breaking OS lib symlinks in the process for _current_ versions used in Alpine OS if they exist now or in the future, potentially destroying OS lib dependencies, and also overwriting the ones possibly included in the future by Alpine OS itself to get your statically copied versions of the various CLI tools to work.
That is _insanely_ shortsighted. There's a safe way to do that and then there is the way you did it. If you want to learn to do it right, look at how Exodus does it so that they don't destroy OS library dependency files in the process of making a binary able to be moved from one OS to another.
Exodus: https://github.com/intoli/exodus
-
FreeBSD Jails for Fun and Profit
Exodus?
Exodus – relocation of Linux binaries–and all of their deps–without containers - https://github.com/intoli/exodus
- Exa · A Modern Replacement for ls
-
How to find all requirements for a linux binary?
This was on hacker News this morning : https://github.com/intoli/exodus
-
Hacker News top posts: Dec 5, 2021
Exodus – relocation of Linux binaries–and all of their deps–without containers\ (49 comments)
- Exodus – relocation of Linux binaries–and all of their deps–without containers
- Exodus – relocation of Linux binaries–and all of their deps–without containers - a very useful piece of software!
bubblewrap
-
I Use Nix on macOS
Nothing nix specific but you may be interested in https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap
- I reduced the size of my Docker image by 40% – Dockerizing shell scripts
- Exploring Podman: A More Secure Docker Alternative
-
Using GitLab Kubernetes Runners to Build Melange Packages
Recently, I came across Chainguard and wrote the article How to build Docker Images with Melange and Apko. As a fervent supporter of Kubernetes and GitLab CI, I was eager to experiment with building images using Melange in this particular setup. GitLab's shared Runners work seamlessly with Bubblewrap, eliminating the need for additional configurations. This post is intended for enthusiasts like myself, interested in hosting their own Kubernetes Runners and leveraging the Kubernetes Runner Type of Melange.
- how strong is the steam (runtime) sandbox for games?
- Server-side sandboxing: Containers and seccomp
-
A Study of Malicious Code in PyPI Ecosystem
```
This is basically manually invoking what Flatpak does:
https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap
This is also useful for more than just security. E.G., you can test how your app would behave on a fresh install by masking your user configuration files. I personally also have a tool that uses it to basically bundle all dependencies from an entire Linux distribution in order to make highly portable AppImages— Been meaning to post that, will get around to it eventually maybe.
The flags above should hide your user data (`--tmpfs`), disable network access (`--unshare-all`), hide/virtualize devices and OS state (`--dev` and `--proc`), and make the rest of the root filesystem read-only (`--ro-bind`— Including the insecure X11 socket in `/tmp`, which you might want to expose for GUI apps).
Check them against `bwrap --help`; I might have omitted one or two more things you'd need.
- Bubblewrap – Low-level unprivileged sandboxing tool used by Flatpak
-
Firejail: Light, featureful and zero-dependency security sandbox for Linux
While trying to find out more comparison information, found this light on details issue:
https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap/issues/81
It mentions nsjail and minijail.
What are some alternatives?
tracker-control-android - TrackerControl Android: monitor and control trackers and ads.
firejail - Linux namespaces and seccomp-bpf sandbox
appimage-builder - GNU/Linux packaging solution using the AppImage format
flatpak - Linux application sandboxing and distribution framework
mirotalksfu - 🏆 WebRTC - SFU - Simple, Secure, Scalable Real-Time Video Conferences Up to 4k, compatible with all browsers and platforms.
flathub - Issue tracker and new submissions
LS_COLORS - A collection of LS_COLORS definitions; needs your contribution!
nsjail - A lightweight process isolation tool that utilizes Linux namespaces, cgroups, rlimits and seccomp-bpf syscall filters, leveraging the Kafel BPF language for enhanced security.
vm-bhyve - Shell based, minimal dependency bhyve manager
distrobox - Use any linux distribution inside your terminal. Enable both backward and forward compatibility with software and freedom to use whatever distribution you’re more comfortable with. Mirror available at: https://gitlab.com/89luca89/distrobox
AppImageKit - Package desktop applications as AppImages that run on common Linux-based operating systems, such as RHEL, CentOS, openSUSE, SLED, Ubuntu, Fedora, debian and derivatives. Join #AppImage on irc.libera.chat
multipass - Multipass orchestrates virtual Ubuntu instances