Our great sponsors
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
xxh
🚀 Bring your favorite shell wherever you go through the ssh. Xonsh shell, fish, zsh, osquery and so on.
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
https://github.com/ogham/exa/issues/367#issuecomment-4285909...
ls taking seconds and exa taking 13 minutes :(
Their website says it's as fast as ls because they do things in parallel but it doesn't seem to actually be as fast as ls in small or large usage.
I'd also say 200ms -> 1.2 seconds is very noticable.
There is a cohort of “replacements” to traditional tools.
Check here: https://github.com/ibraheemdev/modern-unix
Some of them are great, some are opinionated.
I recently wrote ls + cd replacement myself: https://github.com/antonmedv/llama
It’s a TUI with fuzzy searching, which helps a lot at navigating in complicated file systems.
2. if you want more or different colours, you can use the `LS_COLORS` environment variable. There are various pre-made snippets around you may want to use. e.g. https://github.com/trapd00r/LS_COLORS
I'll just drop these here as they might be useful to you
https://github.com/xxh/xxh
I only took a quick glance at the https://asciinema.org stuff. Exa seemed way slower in comparison to ls. Again, I would have to test it myself and see how much it affects me if at all. That said, I do not see a reason to switch to it because ls supports colors as well, and I do not need the added extra information.