esp-web-tools VS noclip.website

Some feedback to make your project easier to install and integrate better with Home Assistant (I'm the founder):

Home Assistant is building a voice assistant as part of our Year of the Voice theme. https://www.home-assistant.io/blog/2023/04/27/year-of-the-vo...

As part of our recent chapter 2 milestone, we introduced new Assist Pipelines. This allows users to configure multiple voice assistants. Your project is using the old "conversation" API. Instead it should use our new assist pipelines API. Docs: https://developers.home-assistant.io/docs/voice/pipelines/

You can even off-load the STT and TTS fully to Home Assistant and only focus on wake words.

You will see a lot higher adoption rate if users can just buy the ESP BOX and install the software on it without installing/compiling stuff. That's exactly why we created ESP Web Tools. It offers projects to offer browser-based installation directly from their website. https://esphome.github.io/esp-web-tools/

If you're going the ESP Web Tools route (and you should!), we've also created Improv Wi-Fi, a small protocol to configure Wi-Fi on the ESP device. This will allow ESP Web Tools to offer an onboarding wizard in the browser once the software has been installed. More info at https://www.improv-wifi.com/

Good luck!

Note: if anyone else wants to make an installer website like this, it’s called ESP Web Tools and open source: https://esphome.github.io/esp-web-tools/

ESP Web Tools uses WebSerial to allow users to install, update and manage firmware running on ESP microcontrollers: https://esphome.github.io/esp-web-tools/

If you want to make the project even more accessible, consider setting up a GitHub pages with ESP Web Tools: https://esphome.github.io/esp-web-tools/

Instead of esptool suggestions, use ESP web tools and your whole flow can be web based. https://esphome.github.io/esp-web-tools/

I know this is definitely not what you’re talking about because it’s a website and not a book but it’s a link always worth sharing https://noclip.website/

As far as I know, yes.. Besides simple differences like register allocation, it's difficult to prove that your code behaves the same as the target if its nonmatching. It's also just really satisfying when you get a match.

When doing standard reverse engineering, you might use something like Ghidra or Hex-Rays. This is what the developer of noclip.website [1] did to reimplement a lot of Mario Galaxy code, such as enemy AI.

[1] https://noclip.website/#smg/AstroGalaxy

I don't know where to get what they used in that video, but the closest thing I could suggest is a site called "noclip" ?

You might also be interested in: https://noclip.website/ (not quake maps)

I also know https://www.halospawns.com/app used to have quake maps (dm6 at least), but can't find it now.

This isn't Ross's "Dream Software", but I find it somewhat related - at least its output. Check out noclip's website here.

https://noclip.website/#snap/1A;ShareData=AUsPn92;%5eVT:h=19... , or to hook up the first one to the second (although the system to signal between distant pokemon, which it probably uses, is mostly implemented). There are a few other instances of things that are supposed to be spawning conditionally which aren't handled yet, like extra lapras in the beach.

I'll leave an article from Pikipedia with a demonstration gif, plus a picture of the whole title screen from The Models Resource and a small comparison I made myself, using noclip.website.