libc
z88dk
libc | z88dk | |
---|---|---|
2 | 6 | |
479 | 853 | |
1.0% | 3.2% | |
7.3 | 9.9 | |
3 months ago | 7 days ago | |
C | Assembly | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
libc
-
Nolibc: A minimal C-library replacement shipped with the kernel
Seems unlikely. My spot check of the the two vfprintf implementations shows no flow from one to the other, and shows that part of the Cosmopolitan code has an older lineage than nolibc.
The nolibc source has many reference to copyright held by "Willy Tarreau", under LGPL-2.1 OR MIT license, with a copyright date starting in 2017.
The string "Tarreau" does not exist in the Cosmopolitan library, so that's a strong negative there. Let's look closer.
The file organization is quite different. And so is the implementation. So that's another negative.
Compare the vfprintf in nolibc at https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.2-rc4/source/tools/inclu... (a 'minimal vfprintf()') with the one in cosmopolitan starting at https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan/blob/master/libc/stdio/....
Right away we can see nolibc places many functions in the same file while Cosmopolitan uses a one-function-per-filename organization.
Cosmopolitan's fvprintf locks the file (which nolibc doesn't need to do) then calls vfprintf_unlocked which calls __fmt at https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan/blob/master/libc/fmt/fm... , which is the actual implementation. It look very different from NOLIBC's.
Okay, so perhaps that's they way now but not at the beginning?
We can also go back to Cosmopolitan's original implementation and see how vfprintf goes through https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan/blob/c91b3c50068224929c... to call "palandprintf", which https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan/blob/c91b3c50068224929c... says is copyright "Marco Paland" from 2014-2019.
That's a few years older than the start of nolibc, available from https://github.com/mpaland/printf , and part of https://github.com/embeddedartistry/libc , a "libc targeted for embedded systems usage".
Thus, multiple factors seem to agree that nolibc code is not used in the Cosmopolitan library.
- Any ultra portable libc?
z88dk
-
Best practice to store context for a C compiler
z88dk
-
Compiler Roms?
And z88dk home page: https://github.com/z88dk/z88dk
- Z88dk v2.2 Release
- transferring code to a ti-84
-
8080 or Z80 compilers
z88dk or sdcc come to mind. I've only done things with z88dk though because it was easier to setup for the msx platform. sdcc has more optimization but i think these days you can use it under z88dk also. Good luck, this is fun! :)
-
Z80 (Z180 & Z80N) 32-Bit and 16-Bit IEEE floating point libraries in the Z88DK
The 32-bit library. https://github.com/z88dk/z88dk/blob/master/libsrc/_DEVELOPMENT/math/float/math32/readme.md