easyfft VS rnnoise

By the way. I also saw this STFT implementation which might be interesting for you: easyfft

With the addition of the thread local scratch buffer, easyfft is just about as fast as pure rustfft can be, with the added ergonomics and safety that easyfft provides!

Sure.

Carla: https://github.com/falkTX/Carla

It lets me install any normal audio pro audio plugins, for example https://github.com/xiph/rnnoise

It also does some cable management, but qpwgraph is maybe better for that.

I looked at your code and the approach (IMO) is kind of bad.

If you want to solve the problem of "voice changer", you can skip the UI entirely and just use plugin parameters. You can also skip the problem of managing the connections. And when you publish your work, every pro audio software (Ableton, Reaper, whatever) can use your audio processing.

Hope that helps.

Interesting! How does it compare with NoiseTorch/RNNoise?

Das ist eine open source lib. Damit sollte das klappen. https://github.com/xiph/rnnoise/blob/master/examples/rnnoise_demo.c

RNNoise (behaves similarly to RTX broadcast/voice/whatever the fuck they're calling it now, but with significantly better performance) - plugs into OBS or other programs flawlessly

OBS ships with rnnoise noise reduction, which is like NVIDIA Broadcast, but works on any CPU. See also NoiseTorch and EasyEffects if you're on Linux.

It's pretty great, works decently, but the sad thing is the author put it out a few years ago, wrote a paper and then moved onto something else and it's pretty much unmaintained and requires some very specific ML knowledge.

https://github.com/xiph/rnnoise

I found this tool https://github.com/xiph/rnnoise and this guide that doesn't have ubuntu guide https://medium.com/@gamunu/linux-noise-cancellation-b9f997f6764d