dominate VS ludic

It feels weird at the beginning, but after a bit of practice I found it pretty nice to write HTML in Python.

Here is an example of a HTML page layout written with the DOMinate [1] library for example, in a "JSX-like" way:

https://github.com/olivierphi/zakuchess/blob/main/src/apps/w...

It may hurt your eyes at first sight, for sure... But similarly to technologies like Tailwind CSS, it's mostly a matter of getting used to it - and after a while it end ups feeling very natural to use :-)

1: https://github.com/Knio/dominate#readme

Pretty much how https://github.com/Knio/dominate does it, but no context variable binding (otherwise gets messy with lots of nesting)

You're conflating two things, dynamically creating HTML is great and lets you avoid JS in a lot of cases. It's whether you should treat your HTML document as the tree of nodes that it is in your programming language or treat it like a string.

https://github.com/Knio/dominate is a Python lib that implements this principal.

Actually excited to giive this HTML field a try - https://github.com/Knio/dominate might come in useful for me to generate the html

How is it different from other existing projects like Dominate?

If you’re talking about generating HTML using Python, I highly recommend the library Dominate. Incredibly intuitive and Pythonic way to generate HTML.

Ive mostly used Dominate for my services. https://github.com/Knio/dominate

ludic – Lightweight framework for building dynamic HTML pages in pure Python

In general, this usually results in front-end logic being very tightly coupled with back-end logic. In some of the examples given, you even have database access in the same line that is generating the HTML document.

https://github.com/paveldedik/ludic/blob/main/examples/click...

It's the kind of thing that looks very cool and concise in small examples, but tends to become a nightmare when you are working on larger projects.