doks VS web.dev

He just recommended that I use HUGO to set up a simple, static website for a non-profit that could be hosted for free on Github and would be fairly simple for me to update using markdown. It sounded like a wonderful idea. He downloaded HUGO & set up WSL for my Windows Terminal for me & I was pretty much on my own to find tutorials for Git & Github, VSCode, Hugo & the Hugo Doks Theme.

Recently I started to configure my digital garden. Foam is a good option, Hugo Doks, No Style Please, Git-Wiki, Researcher, Thinkspace, and other themes are good for zetteltasken pages.

Take a look at this theme for documentation. https://getdoks.org/

Thanks, yes of course — https://getdoks.org/.

Download Doks theme for Hugo

Download Doks Doks demo site Minimum Hugo version: 0.80 GitHub stars: 952 License: MIT

I am trying to create a second docs page, e.g. called `docs`, that should have the same layout as the `docs` page. I managed to do this by following [this](https://github.com/h-enk/doks/discussions/173) discussion topic. I managed to add the second page, all with correct menu entries and the sidebar showing correctly.

Before we start creating pages in our application, it's important to understand how Next.js renders content. The framework supports multiple rendering methods including server-side rendering (SSR), static site rendering (SSG), and client-side rendering (CSR). There are many pros and cons to each rendering method (too many to cover in this post) so if these concepts are new to you, Google’s web.dev site has a very good introduction to rendering on the web that can help you understand rendering options.

The lifecycle of an interaction. Source: web.dev

Probably not, it's the CSS used so far, so if there are elements you've not interacted with, that's an issue. This web.dev article gives some tools you can use https://web.dev/articles/extract-critical-css

I noticed the same for Google's site https://web.dev/

The last article pushed to the feed was "Changes to the web.dev infrastructure" few months ago https://web.dev/blog/webdev-migration

The feed still there but with no updates https://web.dev/feed.xml and on the site you can see new articles published.

Is sad that on a infrastructure revamp of a modern site, the RSS feed was left out of the features list (at least for now).

Upon testing on Firefox and Mi Browser, there was no triggering of the BeforeInstallPrompt event, as expected. However, I noticed that web.dev manages to display a prompt on these browsers, even though they theoretically lack support for the BeforeInstallPrompt event.

web.dev, maintained by Google, including posts by Chrome developers and their co-workers,

In a old web.dev articleI came across the word "Incremental (Re)Hydration" which is linked to a Glimmer.js-Blog post (also called "Incremental Rendering" there) confuses me. Is Incremental (Re)Hydration the same as Progressive (Re)Hydration? Reading the Glimmer-Blog article it seems so, but in the web.devarticle it seems to be something different.

Web.dev newsletter - though it's not a weekly newsletter and it's only content from web.dev (though really high quality content)

Just open up a text edi web developers are self-taught. a website. That's what I did. Some people like this: https://web.dev