web.dev VS lite-youtube-embed

Before we start creating pages in our application, it's important to understand how Next.js renders content. The framework supports multiple rendering methods including server-side rendering (SSR), static site rendering (SSG), and client-side rendering (CSR). There are many pros and cons to each rendering method (too many to cover in this post) so if these concepts are new to you, Google’s web.dev site has a very good introduction to rendering on the web that can help you understand rendering options.

The lifecycle of an interaction. Source: web.dev

Probably not, it's the CSS used so far, so if there are elements you've not interacted with, that's an issue. This web.dev article gives some tools you can use https://web.dev/articles/extract-critical-css

I noticed the same for Google's site https://web.dev/

The last article pushed to the feed was "Changes to the web.dev infrastructure" few months ago https://web.dev/blog/webdev-migration

The feed still there but with no updates https://web.dev/feed.xml and on the site you can see new articles published.

Is sad that on a infrastructure revamp of a modern site, the RSS feed was left out of the features list (at least for now).

Upon testing on Firefox and Mi Browser, there was no triggering of the BeforeInstallPrompt event, as expected. However, I noticed that web.dev manages to display a prompt on these browsers, even though they theoretically lack support for the BeforeInstallPrompt event.

web.dev, maintained by Google, including posts by Chrome developers and their co-workers,

In a old web.dev articleI came across the word "Incremental (Re)Hydration" which is linked to a Glimmer.js-Blog post (also called "Incremental Rendering" there) confuses me. Is Incremental (Re)Hydration the same as Progressive (Re)Hydration? Reading the Glimmer-Blog article it seems so, but in the web.devarticle it seems to be something different.

Web.dev newsletter - though it's not a weekly newsletter and it's only content from web.dev (though really high quality content)

Just open up a text edi web developers are self-taught. a website. That's what I did. Some people like this: https://web.dev

Maybe a good place to mention Paul Irish’s lite-youtube-embed:

"Provide videos with a supercharged focus on visual performance. This custom element renders just like the real thing but approximately 224× faster."

https://github.com/paulirish/lite-youtube-embed

That's always been the case. Having too many Google Ads can even downrank you in search results for being a bad user experience.

For Youtube embeds, I prefer Lite Youtube Embed[1] by the magnificent Paul Irish.

[1] https://github.com/paulirish/lite-youtube-embed

What I use → For Youtube videos I started using lite-youtube-embed package, following the advice of Debbie O'brien and web.dev!

Video is great, but the default YouTube embed share is both bloated and not privacy-minded. I finally switched my YouTube embeds to lite-youtube-embed by Paul Irish, and it's fantastic. It loads "faster than a sneeze" and uses the no-cookie version by default.

The Lite Youtube Embed project by Paul Irish is a perfect example of fake loading: it takes a Youtube Video ID and presents only a thumbnail with a play button :