django-oauth-toolkit VS GNU Emacs

View on GitHub

Just to be clear: I'm asking for LDAP to be one possible choice. If an installation wants to use LDAP BIND they can use that, or if the want to use SAML they could use that, or OATH. But not at the same time: you get to choose one.

Django Authentication system for example has a User object that allows different backends to feed into it:

* https://django-auth-ldap.readthedocs.io/

* https://django-oauth-toolkit.readthedocs.io/

* https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22668434/saml-with-djang...

You would need to store whatever identifier the oauth provider gives you along with access and refresh tokens. That said, I wouldn't try to implement this from scratch, since it is not trivial. Try django-oauth-toolkit

Thankfully you don't need to implement this giant standard yourself. You can use the excellent Django OAuth Toolkit package. They also have a specific section in their documentation for using it with DRF.

I would suggest token auth as it is stateless, secure and can be used on multiple devices. OAuth/OAuth2 is the industry standard at the moment but you can also use a simple JWT token signature. On top of this, Django REST framework offers a lot of libraries for this purpose e.g. django-rest-framework-simplejwt, django-rest-framework-social-oauth2, django-oauth-toolkit, and more.

gnu.org - contains everything you need to research his philosophy.

stallman.org - personal website, contains a lot of opinion, but I absolutely respect this man in all what he says.

emacs.org (redirects to https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) - his non-philosophical work, one of two mainstream console text editors.

Forever, there was a file included in stock Emacs, `spook.el`, which could be hooked up to automatically add random strings of "interesting" keywords to each of your email or Usenet messages (in signatures, or in headers like `X-Spook`).

https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Ma...

Looks like copyright date of 1988:

https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/lisp/play/...

https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/etc/spook....

Try `M-x spook RET` in an Emacs buffer.

If you want to spare a couple of detours, you probably could start with Emacs Org-mode according to Greenspun's eleventh rule: "Any sufficiently complicated PIM or note-taking program contains an ad hoc, informally specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Org mode."

Emacs: winget install GNU.Emacs

The whole cl-lib thing is a total disaster:

https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/lisp/emacs...

They added cl- as a prefix to each Common Lisp symbol.

FIRST is now called cl-first, CAAAR is now cl-caaar .

I would really prefer if GNU Emacs removes all Common Lisp functionality, instead of creating this really wacky stuff, with discussions about this topic every year.

Never too late to try! Take your time. Emacs will outlive us all. https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

GNU Emacs is a versatile, open-source text editor that offers extensibility and customization—a sort of self-documenting real-time display editor. Our thanks for the suggestion go to CartanAnnullator.

Emacs

Their DEFUN and DEFVAR macros for example let us define a function or a variable that will be available as a Lisp function, and can be used as an ordinary C function from the C code. Emacs is written in pure C99 language and works with both GCC and Clang I believe. We can just define a C function via macro, and it is auto exported and made available to Lisp. For example my first patch to Emacs was for this function (we added "count" argument to make it possible to skip enumerating files in a directory for the case when user code is just interesting if a directory is empty or not):