disconnect-tracking-protection
rr
disconnect-tracking-protection | rr | |
---|---|---|
13 | 102 | |
632 | 8,640 | |
- | 0.8% | |
8.2 | 9.6 | |
16 days ago | 8 days ago | |
C++ | ||
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
disconnect-tracking-protection
-
Firefox 118
Right, but Firefox’s ETP blocks Statcounter’s JS (see https://github.com/disconnectme/disconnect-tracking-protecti... which is where, I believe, Mozilla source their ETP blocklist from).
-
Question regarding portmaster's use of a depricated ad-list
Is there a particular reason portmaster uses the depricated and unofficial Disconnect.me Ad Domains (DM-AD) found at https://s3.amazonaws.com/lists.disconnect.me/simple_ad.txt rather than the official up-to-date list found at https://github.com/disconnectme/disconnect-tracking-protection/blob/master/services.json ?
-
?
You're wrong. People have noticed that they use Whiteops (now called HUMAN Security) browser fingerprinting.
-
I downloaded a supposed cryptocurrency miner on pc and I thought I deleted it but deep in my files there are folders called "sigma" the name of cryptocurrency miner and they also have a file called cryptomining.data
The lists are part of an open source project that can be found on Github.
-
Which Tracking list is Brave's Default tracker and content blocking list and how to find it?
Like Microsoft Edge has shared that they use Disconnect's list. Which list is being used by Brave?
- Is Firefox not always able to identify a tracker, or does tracker not include what i think it does?
-
John Oliver Blackmails Congress With Their Own Digital Data - The ‘Last Week Tonight’ host paid shady brokers for lawmakers’ digital histories — promising not to release the info so long as Congress passes legislation protecting all consumers’ data
However the ultimate proof that it’s effective is that advertisers use it: a quarter of the top 10,000 websites globally use fingerprinting (https://www.zdnet.com/article/a-quarter-of-the-alexa-top-10k-websites-are-using-browser-fingerprinting-scripts/) and basically every company you’ve heard of uses it: https://github.com/disconnectme/disconnect-tracking-protection/blob/master/descriptions.md
-
Firefox focus blocks more trackers than DDG browser. 40 trackers vs 9. Any idea why DDG is less agressive?
Firefox Focus is based on the Mozilla/Firefox/Disconnect tracking block-lists. (https://github.com/disconnectme/disconnect-tracking-protection)
-
Is Edge's tracking protection same with firefox or even better in protecting user data?
Edge and Firefox use lists provided by Disconnect. I find it quite lacking. If you take a look at their GitHub, it's only occasionaly updated and there's a lot of ignored open issues.
-
Mozilla Explains: Cookies and supercookies
I see what you're saying. I don't expect that will have much, if any, effect. First, their block list is limited: https://github.com/disconnectme/disconnect-tracking-protection/blob/master/services.json
rr
- rr: Lightweight Recording and Deterministic Debugging
-
Hermit is a hermetic and reproducible sandbox for running programs
I think this tool must share a lot techniques and use cases with rr. I wonder how it compares in various aspects.
https://rr-project.org/
rr "sells" as a "reversible debugger", but it obviously needs the determinism for its record and replay to work, and AFAIK it employs similar techniques regarding system call interception and serializing on a single CPU. The reversible debugger aspect is built on periodic snapshotting on top of it and replaying from those snapshots, AFAIK. They package it in a gdb compatible interface.
Hermit also lists record/replay as a motivation, although it doesn't list reversible debugging in general.
- Rr: Lightweight Recording and Deterministic Debugging
-
Deep Bug
Interesting. Perhaps you can inspect the disassembly of the function in question when using Graal and HotSpot. It is likely related to that.
Another debugging technique we use for heisenbugs is to see if `rr` [1] can reproduce it. If it can then that's great as it allows you to go back in time to debug what may have caused the bug. But `rr` is often not great for concurrency bugs since it emulates a single-core machine. Though debugging a VM is generally a nightmare. What we desperately need is a debugger that can debug both the VM and the language running on top of it. Usually it's one or the other.
> In general I’d argue you haven’t fixed a bug unless you understand why it happened and why your fix worked, which makes this frustrating, since every indication is that the bug exists within proprietary code that is out of my reach.
Were you using Oracle GraalVM? GraalVM community edition is open source, so maybe it's worth checking if it is reproducible in that.
[1]: https://github.com/rr-debugger/rr
-
So you think you want to write a deterministic hypervisor?
https://rr-project.org/ had the same problem. They use the retired conditional branch counter instead of instruction counter, and then instruction steeping until at the correct address.
-
Is Something Bugging You?
That'll work great for your Distributed QSort Incorporated startup, where the only product is a sorting algorithm.
Formal software verification is very useful. But what can be usefully formalized is rather limited, and what can be formalized correctly in practice is even more limited. That means you need to restrict your scope to something sane and useful. As a result, in the real world running thousands of tests is practically useful. (Well, it depends on what those tests are; it's easy to write 1000s of tests that either test the same thing, or only test the things that will pass and not the things that would fail.) They are especially useful if running in a mode where the unexpected happens often, as it sounds like this system can do. (It's reminiscent of rr's chaos mode -- https://rr-project.org/ linking to https://robert.ocallahan.org/2016/02/introducing-rr-chaos-mo... )
-
When "letting it crash" is not enough
The approach of check-pointing computation such that it is resumable and restartable sounds similar to a time-traveling debugger, like rr or WinDbg:
https://rr-project.org/
https://learn.microsoft.com/windows-hardware/drivers/debugge...
- When I got started I debugged using printf() today I debug with print()
- Rr: Record and Replay Debugger – Reverse Debugger
-
OpenBSD KDE Plasma Desktop
https://github.com/rr-debugger/rr?tab=readme-ov-file#system-...
What are some alternatives?
supercookie - ⚠️ Browser fingerprinting via favicon!
CodeLLDB - A native debugger extension for VSCode based on LLDB
AmIUnique - Learn how identifiable you are on the Internet
rrweb - record and replay the web
CustomCSSforFx - Custom CSS tweaks for Firefox
gef - GEF (GDB Enhanced Features) - a modern experience for GDB with advanced debugging capabilities for exploit devs & reverse engineers on Linux
hosts - 🔒 Consolidating and extending hosts files from several well-curated sources. Optionally pick extensions for porn, social media, and other categories.
Module Linker - browse modules by clicking directly on "import" statements on GitHub
disconnect-tracking-protecti
nbdev - Create delightful software with Jupyter Notebooks
orb - Opaque Response Blocking (CORB++)
clog-cli - Generate beautiful changelogs from your Git commit history