ddosify VS hyperfine

DDosify: https://github.com/ddosify/ddosify

We are thrilled to announce the release of Ddosify Self-Hosted on GitHub today. Unlike the Ddosify Engine, this version features a No-code UI and supports distributed traffic generation.

Ddosify is built with ease of use and flexibility in mind, and it supports popular web protocols. It allows you to define and customize test scenarios, generate realistic loads, and monitor performance metrics in real time.

We have organized this write-up into two parts to demonstrate two different features of Ddosify. In the first part, we will perform a load test on a GET endpoint that accepts base and target currency and returns their exchange rate of them. The rand() utility method is used to send different currencies on each request. In the second part, we will test a POST endpoint that performs exchange operations. We will use a CSV file that contains test data stored on our Test App's Database. Then we import this CSV file into Ddosify to replay the same transactions stored on DB, but in high concurrency. In both parts, we will gain insights into the reliability of our exchange API across high traffic.

Check out the official hyperfine Github repo

And then I used hyperfine to run the benchmarks on my MacBook Pro 14 M2 Max, and here are the results:

Search "benchmarking tools for linux" and decide that hyperfine is good for what I'm doing. Run Jennifer's new python script against my refactored perl and find that the python is 1.26 times faster for k=3 and 1.47 times faster for k=4. For the Covid-19 sequence, these are both on the order of hundreds of milliseconds.

> It is very possible to write sub 100ms procedures in TS, […]

I will not disagree with this statement because I don’t have a way to test inshellisense right now. Could you (or anyone with a working Node + NPM installation) please install inshellisense and post the actual numbers? Perhaps using a tool like hyperfine (https://github.com/sharkdp/hyperfine).

Yeah, while it's not as thorough as these tools, the method is at least reproducible and sane, and with ~10 or so samples, you get an interval with a nice confidence.

Another through method will be hyperfine[0], yet I wanted to provide a method which requires no installation and can be done in a whim, without jumps and hoops, with the tools already at hand.

[0]: https://github.com/sharkdp/hyperfine

That is native and inbuild but I would suggest below options instead 1. Using lazy's Profile tab instead https://github.com/folke/lazy.nvim 2. Using a dedicated plugin to do this https://github.com/dstein64/vim-startuptime. 3. Using an external program hyperfine is one that I use https://github.com/sharkdp/hyperfine

Fair enough, although might I recommend using hyperfine for your testing? ;p