hyperfine
fd
Our great sponsors
hyperfine | fd | |
---|---|---|
72 | 172 | |
19,598 | 31,243 | |
- | - | |
8.2 | 8.8 | |
15 days ago | 4 days ago | |
Rust | Rust | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
hyperfine
-
Faster tetranucleotide (k-mer) frequencies!
Search "benchmarking tools for linux" and decide that hyperfine is good for what I'm doing. Run Jennifer's new python script against my refactored perl and find that the python is 1.26 times faster for k=3 and 1.47 times faster for k=4. For the Covid-19 sequence, these are both on the order of hundreds of milliseconds.
- Hyperfine: A command-line benchmarking tool
- FLaNK Weekly 08 Jan 2024
-
Show HN: Inshellisense – IDE style shell autocomplete
> It is very possible to write sub 100ms procedures in TS, […]
I will not disagree with this statement because I don’t have a way to test inshellisense right now. Could you (or anyone with a working Node + NPM installation) please install inshellisense and post the actual numbers? Perhaps using a tool like hyperfine (https://github.com/sharkdp/hyperfine).
-
Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer
Yeah, while it's not as thorough as these tools, the method is at least reproducible and sane, and with ~10 or so samples, you get an interval with a nice confidence.
Another through method will be hyperfine[0], yet I wanted to provide a method which requires no installation and can be done in a whim, without jumps and hoops, with the tools already at hand.
-
How to optimize your config? What are mistakes to avoid when optimizing your config?
That is native and inbuild but I would suggest below options instead 1. Using lazy's Profile tab instead https://github.com/folke/lazy.nvim 2. Using a dedicated plugin to do this https://github.com/dstein64/vim-startuptime. 3. Using an external program hyperfine is one that I use https://github.com/sharkdp/hyperfine
-
How to remove all <br> from all of my .html files
Fair enough, although might I recommend using hyperfine for your testing? ;p
-
Making Python 100x faster with less than 100 lines of Rust
Very nice. Thanks for sharing.
-
Profile-guided optimization of a Go application
Go has benchmarking tools in standard library, but in this case it is easier to use hyperfine to measure performance of a CLI app.
-
Any Linux admins willing to try Pygrep?
It's vitally important that you make tests on small changes, and also have consistent testing methodology - same file and search parameters from one run to the next. I personally like using hyperfine to call the Python script, but anything should work. Also, if you're testing this on a laptop, it needs to be plugged in (and the CPU power management tuned for max performance when on wall power), and not too hot - thermal throttling can kill test results.
fd
-
Level Up Your Dev Workflow: Conquer Web Development with a Blazing Fast Neovim Setup (Part 1)
ripgrep: A super-fast file searcher. You can install it using your system's package manager (e.g., brew install ripgrep on macOS). fd: Another blazing-fast file finder. Installation instructions can be found here: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd
-
Hyperfine: A command-line benchmarking tool
hyperfine is such a great tool that it's one of the first I reach for when doing any sort of benchmarking.
I encourage anyone who's tried hyperfine and enjoyed it to also look at sharkdp's other utilities, they're all amazing in their own right with fd[1] being the one that perhaps get the most daily use for me and has totally replaced my use of find(1).
-
Z – Jump Around
You call it with `n` and get an interactive fuzzy search for your directories. If you do `n ` instead, it’ll start the find with `` already filled in (and if there’s only one match, jump to it directly). The `ls` is optional but I find that I like having the contents visible as soon as I change a directory.
I’m also including iCloud Drive but excluding the Library directory as that is too noisy. I have a separate `nl` function which searches just inside `~/Library` for when I need it, as well as other specialised `n` functions that search inside specific places that I need a lot.
-
Unix as IDE: Introduction (2012)
Many (most?) of them have been overhauled with success. For find there is fd[1]. There's batcat, exa (ls), ripgrep, fzf, atuin (history), delta (diff) and many more.
Most are both backwards compatible and fresh and friendly. Your hardwon muscle memory still of good use. But there's sane flags and defaults too. It's faster, more colorful (if you wish), better integration with another (e.g. exa/eza or aware of git modifications). And, in my case, often features I never knew I needed (atuin sync!, ripgrep using gitignore).
- Tell HN: My Favorite Tools
-
Potencializando Sua Experiência no Linux: Conheça as Ferramentas em Rust para um Desenvolvimento Eficiente
Descubra mais sobre o fd em: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd
-
Making Hard Things Easy
AFAIK there is a find replacement with sane defaults: https://github.com/sharkdp/fd , a lot of people I know love it.
However, I already have this in my muscle memory:
-
🐚🦀Comandos shell reescritos em Rust
fd
-
Oils 0.17.0 – YSH Is Becoming Real
> without zsh globs I have to remember find syntax
My "solution" to this is using https://github.com/sharkdp/fd (even when in zsh and having glob support). I'm not sure if using a tool that's not present by default would be suitable for your use cases, but if you're considering alternate shells, I suspect you might be
-
Bfs 3.0: The Fastest Find Yet
Nice to see other alternatives to find. I personally use fd (https://github.com/sharkdp/fd) a lot, as I find the UX much better. There is one thing that I think could be better, around the difference between "wanting to list all files that follow a certain pattern" and "wanting to find one or a few specific files". Technically, those are the same, but an issue I'll often run into is wanting to search something in dotfiles (for example the Go tools), use the unrestricted mode, and it'll find the few files I'm looking for, alongside hundreds of files coming from some cache/backup directory somewhere. This happens even more with rg, as it'll look through the files contents.
I'm not sure if this is me not using the tool how I should, me not using Linux how I should, me using the wrong tool for this job, something missing from the tool or something else entirely. I wonder if other people have this similar "double usage issue", and I'm interested in ways to avoid it.
What are some alternatives?
telescope.nvim - Find, Filter, Preview, Pick. All lua, all the time.
ripgrep - ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore
fzf - :cherry_blossom: A command-line fuzzy finder
exa - A modern replacement for ‘ls’.
skim - Fuzzy Finder in rust!
vim-grepper - :space_invader: Helps you win at grep.
criterion.rs - Statistics-driven benchmarking library for Rust
vifm - Vifm is a file manager with curses interface, which provides Vim-like environment for managing objects within file systems, extended with some useful ideas from mutt.
watchexec - Executes commands in response to file modifications
fzf.vim - fzf :heart: vim
the_silver_searcher - A code-searching tool similar to ack, but faster.
bat - A cat(1) clone with wings.