customasm VS java-2-times-faster-than-c

I'm using customasm to write code in Turing Complete.

also if you start writing programs for your own CPUs, use something like CustomASM so you don't have to write in machine code.

either way if you plan on doing more CPUs and similar in the future i highly recommend CustomASM.

The source code was in Python. I was able to debug it using Arduino-based adapter and (by using some "magic") translate into machine code binary. Since then I've switched to CustomAsm for code compilation and have other means to debug (emulator and debugger tool).

Even though technically not an emulators-related post, I'd like to share a tool I've recently learned came across and found to be really useful. It's called customasm and is open source. It can compile assembly of any kind as long as you feed it with (what's called) rules-definition. You can even write a higher level language profile (such as C, sort of) through it, the possibilities are countless, so to say.

I've got the documentation in the wiki! https://github.com/hlorenzi/customasm/wiki/User-Guide

Thanks to hlorenzi, making an assembler is a bunch of work. https://github.com/hlorenzi/customasm

anyways, it might be a good idea to throw the entire project on Github once it's done. stuff like schematics, BOM, details about the function of the CPU, maybe an Assembler (CustomASM is pretty good), also maybe a simulator version in something like Digital or Logisim so that people can look at it, write programs, or rebuild it with different parts and such

I used https://github.com/hlorenzi/customasm along with info from https://www.reddit.com/r/beneater/comments/cori8t/custom_asm_compiler_definition/

As far as the absolute performance you have this sort of effect too. https://github.com/xemantic/java-2-times-faster-than-c

There are plenty of cases where this is clearly disproved. Here's a few.