compiler-team
flamegraph
compiler-team | flamegraph | |
---|---|---|
46 | 47 | |
380 | 4,262 | |
1.8% | 1.5% | |
6.8 | 7.4 | |
13 days ago | 12 days ago | |
HTML | Rust | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
compiler-team
-
The Rust Calling Convention We Deserve
> Also, why aren't we size-sorting fields already?
We are for struct/enum fields. https://camlorn.net/posts/April%202017/rust-struct-field-reo...
There's even an unstable flag to help catch incorrect assumptions about struct layout. https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/457
- Rust proposal for ABI for higher-level languages
-
The Linux Kernel Prepares for Rust 1.77 Upgrade
Are you talking about https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/688 ? I think that issue provides a lot of interesting context for this specific improvement.
-
Progress toward a GCC-based Rust compiler
And mips64, which rustc recently dumped support for after their attempt to extort funding/resources from Loongson failed:
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/648
This is the biggest problem with the LLVM mentality: they use architecture support as a means to extract support (i.e. salaried dev positions) from hardware companies.
GNU may have annoyingly-higher standards for merging changes, but once it's in there and supported they will keep it for the long haul.
-
Cargo has never frustrated me like npm or pip has. Does Cargo ever get frustrating? Does anyone ever find themselves in dependency hell?
See https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/688
- Rust: Drop MIPS to Tier 3
-
There is now a proposal to switch Rustc Nightly to use a parallel frontend
The work has been going on for some time now and it seems we are quite close to it being enabled as a default for nightly builds, I am super thrilled upwards of 20% faster clean builds and possibly more are on the horizon. Hope everything works out without triggering some unseen ICE. https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/681 Edit: If you want to discuss this feature reach out on Zulip
-
Rust 1.72.0
I'd recommend reading the MCP[1] they linked regarding the decision as well as their target tier policy [2].
They are dropping tier 1 support for Win 7 and Win 8. That means they are no longer going to guarantee that the project builds on those platforms and passes all tests via CI.
As long as it is feasible they will probably keep CI runs for those platforms and if interested parties step up and provide sufficient maintenance support, it will remain tier 2. i.e a guarantee that it builds on those platforms via CI but not necessarily that all features are supported and guaranteed via passing tests.
If interested parties can provide sufficient maintenance that all tests continue passing, it will be tier 1 in all but name. However the rest of the development community won't waste their time with issues like Win 7 and 8's partial support for UTF-8.
And once CI stops being feasible for the compiler team to host, it'll drop down to tier 3. If there's sufficient interest from the community towards maintaining these targets, in practice you should see comparable support to with tiers 1 or 2 however now any CI will be managed externally by the community and the compiler team will stop worrying about changes that could break compilation on those targets.
TLDR: They aren't saying "it'll no longer work" but rather "if you want it to stay maintained for these targets, you have to pitch in dev hours to maintain it and eventually support the infrastructure to do this because we don't see a reason to continue doing this". So if you care for these targets, you'll have to contribute to keep it maintained.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/651
- Experimental feature gate for `extern "crabi"` ABI
-
Prerequisites for a Windows XP 3D game engine
(The already broken) XP support was removed almost 3 years ago: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/378
flamegraph
-
Rust Tooling: 8 tools that will increase your productivity
You can install cargo-flamegraph with cargo install flamegraph. There are some underlying requirements to be able to use cargo-flamegraph; you will want to take a look at the repo here to make sure you have the right dependencies.
-
Need help making sense of these benchmark results
I tried to diagnose the issue with flamegraph, but unfortunately the flamegraph didn't show anything beyond the next call for some reason
-
Why is my code so slow ? advent of code 2022, day 16 (basic graph stuff)
having some tools to identify slowness origins (flamegraph is one... but not sure it's the way to go)
-
why is my code so slow ? advent of code 2023, day 16 (basic graph stuff)
I'm currently implementing a solution for the first part of the day 16. It work but it is really slow... I'd like to : - understand why - having some tools to identify slowness origins (flamegraph is one... but not sure it's the way to go) - eventually have some clue/solution/idea - have general feedback on what in my "coding style" is not appropriate for rust (I come from java/kotlin/ts even if I've already coded a bit in c/c++) : for example I love iterator & sequence but i feel they are not really suited to overuse in rust (mostly because of async & result).
-
how expensive is an operation?
Use a profiler. Flamegraph is a good way to visualise profiler output. This lets you identify which functions are taking up a large amount of time - and hence helps you identify where to focus your optimisation efforts.
-
Slow Rust Redis
You tried trying to see what takes the most time under load via flames? https://github.com/flamegraph-rs/flamegraph
- making a virtual machine in rust
-
Need help with rust performance
Well, in cases like that the answer is straight forward, use a profiler like https://github.com/flamegraph-rs/flamegraph
-
superdiff - a way to find similar code blocks in projects (comments appreciated)
I don't see any obvious problems with your algorithm. I've had luck using cargo-flamegraph to identify the slow parts of my code. That's going to show you which parts to focus on improving the performance of!
-
Data-driven performance optimization with Rust and Miri
From the readme of cargo flamegraph:
What are some alternatives?
libvfio-user - framework for emulating devices in userspace
cargo-flamegraph - Easy flamegraphs for Rust projects and everything else, without Perl or pipes <3
llvm-mos - Port of LLVM to the MOS 6502 and related processors
tracing - Application level tracing for Rust.
ua-parser-js - UAParser.js - Free & open-source JavaScript library to detect user's Browser, Engine, OS, CPU, and Device type/model. Runs either in browser (client-side) or node.js (server-side).
tensorflow_macos - TensorFlow for macOS 11.0+ accelerated using Apple's ML Compute framework.
namespacing-rfc - RFC for Packages as Optional Namespaces
hashbrown - Rust port of Google's SwissTable hash map
cargo-show-asm - cargo subcommand showing the assembly, LLVM-IR and MIR generated for Rust code
heaptrack - A heap memory profiler for Linux
libgccjit-patches - Patches awaiting review for libgccjit
snmalloc-rs - rust bindings of snmalloc