clasp
PurefunctionPipelineDataflow
clasp | PurefunctionPipelineDataflow | |
---|---|---|
47 | 172 | |
2,517 | 439 | |
1.0% | - | |
9.7 | 7.4 | |
2 days ago | 15 days ago | |
Common Lisp | ||
- | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
clasp
-
I Accidentally a Scheme
I accidentally a Common Lisp that interoperates with C++ (https://github.com/clasp-developers/clasp.git). We would also like to move beyond BDWGC and Whiffle looks interesting. I will reach out to you and maybe we can chat about it.
-
Val, a high-level systems programming language
Clasp might be such a language, it seems.
https://github.com/clasp-developers/clasp
-
The jank programming language (by Jeaye Wilkerson)
/u/jeaye are you aware of CLASP? https://github.com/clasp-developers/clasp https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbdXeRBbgDM
- Clasp v2.3.0 ยท Bytecode compiled images, preliminary Apple Silicon support, LLVM16.
-
Proof of Concept clang plugin that automatically binds C/C++ -> Lua
Sounds to me like CLASP; it automatically exports C++ objects to be used from Common Lisp also via llvm.
-
Running Lisp in production @ grammarly
Now, the difference of compiling speed of SBCL and CCL is not so big. Look at cl-benchmark, LispWorks is really fast, CCL is on par with Allegro, SBCL is close to CCL. Or https://github.com/clasp-developers/clasp/wiki/Relative-Compile-Performance-of-clasp, it depends on specific project (SBCL sometimes faster, slower, alike), overall difference is not big.
-
What help is needed for Lisp community in order to make Lisp more popular?
So..
"Why do you want to make Lisp more popular? If you were sucessful, what would be different in the world, and why is that desirable to you?"
Normally at this point I'd listen to the response, and ask more questions based on that. That would wind up with a very, very deep thread, so I'll break a cardinal rule and pre-guess at some answers.
This kind of question comes up pretty frequently. In many cases, I suspect the motivation behind the question is "Wow! Here's this cool tool I've discovered. I want to make something really useful with it. I want to do it as part of a community effort; share my excitement with others, share in their excitement, and know that what I'm making is useful because others find it desirable and are excited by it." The field could be cooking, sports, old machine tools, tiny homes, or demo scene. Its the fundemental driver for most content on HN, YouTube, Instructables, and such. It is a Good Thing.
If that is your motivator, then my suggestion is to find something that bugs you and fix it. You've already decided you're only interested in code, not other aspects. You said you preferred vim, but the emacs ecosystem has a very rich set of sharp edges that need filing off, and a rich set of tools with which to attack them.
One example: even after 50 years there's no open IDE which allows you to easily globally rename a Lisp identifier. I don't know about LispWorks or other proprietary environments, but you can't in emacs or vim do a right-click on "foo" in "(defun foo ()...)" and select a command which automatically renames it in all invocations. [Queue lots of "but you can..." replies here.] I don't think vim is up to the task of doing this internally. It would be possible in emacs; but would require a huge effort with lots of help from other people. If you emerged alive from that rabbit warren you'd join the company of Certified "How Hard Could it Be?" Mad Scientists such as Dr. "I just want to draw molecules" Meister [1] and "Wouldn't an OS in Lisp be Cool" Froggey [2].
[1] https://github.com/clasp-developers/clasp
[2] Mezzano https://github.com/froggey/Mezzano
-
Linux Kernel 6.1 Released with Initial Rust Code
But also, there's a reason why most implementations readily make an effort to provide interoperability tools with a variety of runtimes. Clasp much like ABCL gives access to a whole library of other libraries trivially wrapped to interoperate with at little to no performance to cost (depending on how thin you make the wrappers, mainly).
- Common Lisp Clasp v2.0.0 released
PurefunctionPipelineDataflow
-
Goodbye, Clean Code
Implement relational data model and programming based on hash-map (NoSQL)
-
How can I learn functional programming?
The Math-based Grand Unified Programming Theory: The Pure Function Pipeline Data Flow with Principle-based Warehouse/Workshop Model
-
Does Intel have an answer (or developing one) for AMDs Infinity Fabric?
I criticized "AMD Infinity Fabric Architecture" at the end of my article "Prediction: Intel will use "RISC-V plus x86 compatibility layer" or "RISC-V plus x86 heterogeneous computing architecture" to develop a new generation of "warehouse/workshop model" CPU".
- The Math-based Grand Unified Programming Theory: The Pure Function Pipeline Data Flow with principle-based Warehouse/Workshop Model
-
What should I do to defend my rights if the architecture of the Apple M1 chip is plagiarized from my theory and architecture?
What's more, you're being somewhat liberal with your "invention" dates here anyway. I'm sure you realize that anyone can review the commit history to see when content was added to the repo. As of Nov 2020, the day Apple announced a fully operational and tested, ready-to-ship silicon package the repo was a just series of bullet points listing out well-known concepts of functional programming sprinkled with some religious analogies and inspirational quotes. The farther you go back in the repo commit history, the less content is there.
- Apple M1 Ultra's architecture is a mistake, and Why Apple is not the creator of the M1 architecture? (with comment from chip designer who have worked at Apple for decades)
- M1 Ultra's architecture is a mistake, and Why Apple is not the creator of the M1 architecture? (with comment from chip designers who have worked at Apple for decades)
What are some alternatives?
Wren - The Wren Programming Language. Wren is a small, fast, class-based concurrent scripting language.
concurrencpp - Modern concurrency for C++. Tasks, executors, timers and C++20 coroutines to rule them all
gdb-dashboard - Modular visual interface for GDB in Python
gophernotes - The Go kernel for Jupyter notebooks and nteract.
CL-CXX-JIT - Common Lisp and CXX interoperation with JIT
verona - Research programming language for concurrent ownership
SICL - A fresh implementation of Common Lisp
clojurust - A proof of concept version of Clojure in Rust.
graalvm-clojure - This project contains a set of "hello world" projects to verify which Clojure libraries do actually compile and produce native images under GraalVM.
refterm - Reference monospace terminal renderer
maru - Maru - a tiny self-hosting lisp dialect
BetterDummy - Unlock your displays on your Mac! Smooth scaling, HiDPI unlock, XDR/HDR extra brightness upscale, DDC, brightness and dimming, dummy displays, PIP and lots more! [Moved to: https://github.com/waydabber/BetterDisplay]