cl-repl
A full-featured repl implementation designed to work with Roswell (by koji-kojiro)
portacle
A portable common lisp development environment (by portacle)
cl-repl | portacle | |
---|---|---|
4 | 37 | |
150 | 681 | |
- | 1.3% | |
0.0 | 3.6 | |
almost 3 years ago | 6 months ago | |
Common Lisp | Shell | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | zlib License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
cl-repl
Posts with mentions or reviews of cl-repl.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-17.
-
Improving REPL experience in terminal?
But you don't have syntax highlighting :( On errors, the debugger looks arcane… cl-repl or sbcli might help. With sbcli, you even don't have the interactive debugger, only the stacktrace. It's easier for beginners (or for quick development). They are based on readline and do some things well (match parenthesis, multiline input for cl-repl).
-
Is There Any Method For Checking If REPL Is Running As a Login Shell?
In order to get syntax highlighting as well as tab completion I have been using cl-repl. I have been having this issue, as well as another issue with cl-repl inheriting some stuff, but do not seem to have the same issue in sbcl either. Could it be a bug in cl-repl? Is there a solid alternative for sbcl?
-
Help me understand how the REPL actually works
If you are doing it for learning, that's fine! But otherwise you could check out and contribute to Alive for VSCode. There's also cl-repl which I think can be distributed in the form of binary images.
-
Why You Should Learn Lisp In 2022?
Then, of course, a solution is to run the scripts from our editor… or from a friendly terminal-based interface? There's Lish, the Lem editor (for CL, Python and other languages), friendly REPLs… (cl-repl)
portacle
Posts with mentions or reviews of portacle.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-22.
-
An Exploration of SBCL Internals (2020)
I agree that it's a hurdle.
Portacle, https://portacle.github.io/ , is a way around config and whatnot, lowering the threshold a little.
-
Selling Lisp by the Pound
Reminder that Portacle is a way to try Common Lisp (and its tooling!) in a portable, self-contained way, on all platforms.
https://portacle.github.io/
-
plain-common-lisp: a lightweight framework created to make it easier for software developers to develop and distribute Common Lisp applications on Microsoft Windows
Thanks for your work! I can definitely see how your project improve CL's accessibility. Not sure if you're aware of the Portacle project, but I think there is an opportunity merging two projects together.
-
Emacs4CL: A 50 line DIY kit to set up vanilla Emacs for Common Lisp
Also it is not much of a kit either since the user is left to install all the tools on their own. User who wants an easy to start kit with Emacs baked in is much better using Portacle or clean Emacs, or some of more polished Emacs distributions like Doom or Prelude together with Roswell for the "kit" part.
- Portacle
-
15 Best Lisp Courses to Take in 2023, for Emacs Lisp, Common Lisp, Scheme and Racket, by ClassCentral -featuring System Crafters
Then there's Portacle, a portable Emacs with SBCL, Quicklisp and Emacs goodies (magit, file-tree…) pre-installed. https://portacle.github.io/
-
What are your opinions on these three books?
There are some updates about Portacle last year. The latest is 1.4c Pre-release. https://github.com/portacle/portacle/releases Without Mac, can not verify it.
-
So i wanna learn Common Lisp
See also Portacle: https://portacle.github.io/ It is a portable Emacs that is ready-to-use for CL: it comes with Slime, some Emacs packages, Quicklisp and git.
-
How to learn Lisp?
Others have covered the language, but you'll also want tooling. An easy one to get started with is Portacle. It's a Lisp compiler, emacs with Lisp plugins, QuickLisp package manager, etc. so you don't have to spend time setting it all up.
-
Trying to get into Lisp, Feeling overwhelmed
1) I also love VSCode ... but for Lisp Emacs really is so much better. Look at Portacle. It basically is Emacs that's well configured for Common Lisp with SBCL right out of the box. You'll have to learn how SLIME work (the shortcuts to recompile running Lisp, etc).
What are some alternatives?
When comparing cl-repl and portacle you can also consider the following projects:
lish - Lisp Shell
awesome-lisp-companies - Awesome Lisp Companies
cl-cookbook - The Common Lisp Cookbook
slime - The Superior Lisp Interaction Mode for Emacs
magic-ed - Editing facility for Common Lisp REPL
evil - The extensible vi layer for Emacs.
Petalisp - Elegant High Performance Computing
emacs4cl - A tiny DIY kit to set up vanilla Emacs for Common Lisp programming
sbcl - Mirror of Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL)'s official repository
sbcli - A REPL for my SBCL needs
sly - Sylvester the Cat's Common Lisp IDE