-
What are the features you'd like to see for a barebones REPL workflow? Have someone already worked on it (I'm only aware of repl-utilities, but it's not really moving further than mere helpers and shortcuts)?
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
check out CIEL, one of it's goal is to be a quality terminal repl
-
-
But you don't have syntax highlighting :( On errors, the debugger looks arcane… cl-repl or sbcli might help. With sbcli, you even don't have the interactive debugger, only the stacktrace. It's easier for beginners (or for quick development). They are based on readline and do some things well (match parenthesis, multiline input for cl-repl).
-
But you don't have syntax highlighting :( On errors, the debugger looks arcane… cl-repl or sbcli might help. With sbcli, you even don't have the interactive debugger, only the stacktrace. It's easier for beginners (or for quick development). They are based on readline and do some things well (match parenthesis, multiline input for cl-repl).
-
Without Lem, how do you edit files? We need to edit and load files in the REPL. magic-ed could help. What if before loading the file, we added some style criticisms? The lisp-critic is waiting to be adopted and expanded (while colisper has too simple rules).
-
Without Lem, how do you edit files? We need to edit and load files in the REPL. magic-ed could help. What if before loading the file, we added some style criticisms? The lisp-critic is waiting to be adopted and expanded (while colisper has too simple rules).
-
Without Lem, how do you edit files? We need to edit and load files in the REPL. magic-ed could help. What if before loading the file, we added some style criticisms? The lisp-critic is waiting to be adopted and expanded (while colisper has too simple rules).
-
clesh
CLESH a very short and simple program, written in Common Lisp, that extends Common Lisp to embed shell code in a manner similar to perl's backtick.
Now, it's only personal, but I like to fire one-off shell commands… can we escape the Lisp REPL or not? If not, we could use a shell pass-through, for example "! ls" with clesh. Ruricolist's cmd is nice to have too. This is becoming an heresy, but what if we could fire a shell command and interpret its result with a Lisp function, or mix and match the two? Lish is doing an awesome work already, although it's a difficult field. Interactive commands like sudo and htop work there, at least. It ships a Lisp REPL and a debugger for the terminal too (similar to Roswell, then).
-
Now, it's only personal, but I like to fire one-off shell commands… can we escape the Lisp REPL or not? If not, we could use a shell pass-through, for example "! ls" with clesh. Ruricolist's cmd is nice to have too. This is becoming an heresy, but what if we could fire a shell command and interpret its result with a Lisp function, or mix and match the two? Lish is doing an awesome work already, although it's a difficult field. Interactive commands like sudo and htop work there, at least. It ships a Lisp REPL and a debugger for the terminal too (similar to Roswell, then).
-
and this prints the documentation of concatenate. As you mentioned, repl-utilities has a few utilities, such as printing a summary for a system. We could go further and ship a web-based image browser, like livedocs.
