captum
jax
Our great sponsors
captum | jax | |
---|---|---|
11 | 82 | |
4,568 | 27,936 | |
2.5% | 4.0% | |
8.6 | 10.0 | |
2 days ago | 3 days ago | |
Python | Python | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
captum
-
[D] [R] Research Problem about Weakly Supervised Learning for CT Image Semantic Segmentation
Most likely, NNs in general love shortcut learning (see Geirhos et al. 2020). In general, local explanations such as grad-cam are quite noisy, and sometimes even inconsistent (see Seo et al. 2018 ). Now, in my experience, I've seen that integrated gradients (see Sundararajan et al 2017) does a better job compared to Grad-CAM (also, add a noise tunnel), but this is only based on my limited experience. I would totally recommend using the implementations from the Captum library for loca explanations.
-
[D] Off-the-shelf image saliency scoring models?
Take a look at captum
-
Can you interrogate a machine learning model to find out why it gave certain predictions?
Sometimes. If explainable predictions are part of your business requirements, it's probably better not to rely entirely on black box models and instead design a system that gives you the information you need as part of it. If you end up using black box models, there are still methods that attempt to help attribute explanations to your prediction. Here's an example of a toolkit for attributing explanations post-hoc to black box model predictions: https://github.com/pytorch/captum
- [D] DL Practitioners, Do You Use Layer Visualization Tools s.a GradCam in Your Process?
-
What kind of explainability techniques exist for Reinforcement learning?
The straightforward way to interpret RL agent's decision is to use captum library.
-
[D] How do you choose which Black-Box Explainability method to use?
My use-case is research-oriented. I work on Explainable AI. Generally, the best package I've come across to compute attributions in Pytorch Captum. If your object detector is in PyTorch, you can perhaps build it in.
-
PyTorch vs. TensorFlow in 2022
Do any JAX experts know if there is an equivalent to https://captum.ai/ - a model interpretability library for pytorch?
In particular i want to be able to measure feature importance on both inputs and internal layers on a sample by sample basis. This is the only thing currently holding me back from using JAX right now.
Alternatively a simle to read/understand/port implementation of DeepLIFT would work too.
thanks
-
DeepLIFT or other explainable api implementations for JAX (like captum for pytorch)?
I'm interested to use JAX but am having a hard time finding anything similar to captum for the pytorch world.
- how to extract features from a (CNN) convolutional network having raw data with (XAI) explainable techinques?
-
Looking for help regarding explainable AI
Do you actually want to implement something? There are decent explainability libraries now, e.g., [AIX360](https://aix360.mybluemix.net/), [InterpretML](https://interpret.ml/), or [captum](https://captum.ai/). Pytorch + maybe pytorch lightning + captum might be the quickest way to actually implement something like an explainable neural net yourself. Do the standard tutorials for each of them and watch a few YT videos (or follow a coursera course or something like that) about how these things work in theory and practice, and you'll get up to speed relatively quickly. You will not be able to do useful work in ML without actually learning the ropes.
jax
-
The Elements of Differentiable Programming
The dual numbers exist just as surely as the real numbers and have been used well over 100 years
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_number
Pytorch has had them for many years.
https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.autograd.for...
JAX implements them and uses them exactly as stated in this thread.
https://github.com/google/jax/discussions/10157#discussionco...
As you so eloquently stated, "you shouldn't be proclaiming things you don't actually know on a public forum," and doubly so when your claimed "corrections" are so demonstrably and totally incorrect.
-
Julia GPU-based ODE solver 20x-100x faster than those in Jax and PyTorch
On your last point, as long as you jit the topmost level, it doesn't matter whether or not you have inner jitted functions. The end result should be the same.
Source: https://github.com/google/jax/discussions/5199#discussioncom...
-
Apple releases MLX for Apple Silicon
The design of MLX is inspired by frameworks like NumPy, PyTorch, Jax, and ArrayFire.
-
MLPerf training tests put Nvidia ahead, Intel close, and Google well behind
I'm still not totally sure what the issue is. Jax uses program transformations to compile programs to run on a variety of hardware, for example, using XLA for TPUs. It can also run cuda ops for Nvidia gpus without issue: https://jax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/installation.html
There is also support for custom cpp and cuda ops if that's what is needed: https://jax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Custom_Operation_for_GP...
I haven't worked with float4, but can imagine that new numerical types would require some special handling. But I assume that's the case for any ml environment.
But really you probably mean fixed point 4bit integer types? Looks like that has had at least some work done in Jax: https://github.com/google/jax/issues/8566
-
MatX: Efficient C++17 GPU numerical computing library with Python-like syntax
>
Are they even comparing apples to apples to claim that they see these improvements over NumPy?
> While the code complexity and length are roughly the same, the MatX version shows a 2100x over the Numpy version, and over 4x faster than the CuPy version on the same GPU.
NumPy doesn't use GPU by default unless you use something like Jax [1] to compile NumPy code to run on GPUs. I think more honest comparison will mainly compare MatX running on same CPU like NumPy as focus the GPU comparison against CuPy.
[1] https://github.com/google/jax
-
JAX – NumPy on the CPU, GPU, and TPU, with great automatic differentiation
Actually that never changed. The README has always had an example of differentiating through native Python control flow:
https://github.com/google/jax/commit/948a8db0adf233f333f3e5f...
The constraints on control flow expressions come from jax.jit (because Python control flow can't be staged out) and jax.vmap (because we can't take multiple branches of Python control flow, which we might need to do for different batch elements). But autodiff of Python-native control flow works fine!
-
Julia and Mojo (Modular) Mandelbrot Benchmark
For a similar "benchmark" (also Mandelbrot) but took place in Jax repo discussion: https://github.com/google/jax/discussions/11078#discussionco...
-
Functional Programming 1
2. https://github.com/fantasyland/fantasy-land (A bit heavy on jargon)
Note there is a python version of Ramda available on pypi and there’s a lot of FP tidbits inside JAX:
3. https://pypi.org/project/ramda/ (Worth making your own version if you want to learn, though)
4. For nested data, JAX tree_util is epic: https://jax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/jax.tree_util.html and also their curry implementation is funny: https://github.com/google/jax/blob/4ac2bdc2b1d71ec0010412a32...
Anyway don’t put FP on a pedestal, main thing is to focus on the core principles of avoiding external mutation and making helper functions. Doesn’t always work because some languages like Rust don’t have legit support for currying (afaik in 2023 August), but in those cases you can hack it with builder methods to an extent.
Finally, if you want to understand the middle of the midwit meme, check out this wiki article and connect the free monoid to the Kleene star (0 or more copies of your pattern) and Kleene plus (1 or more copies of your pattern). Those are also in regex so it can help you remember the regex symbols. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_monoid?wprov=sfti1
The simplest example might be {0}^* in which case
0: “” // because we use *
-
Best Way to Learn JAX
Hello! I'm trying to learn JAX over the next couple of weeks. Ideally, I want to be comfortable with using it for projects after about 3 weeks to a month, although I understand that may not be realistic. I currently have experience with PyTorch and TensorFlow. How should I go about learning JAX? Is there a specific YouTube tutorial or online course I should use, or should I just use the tutorial on https://jax.readthedocs.io/? Any information, advice, or experience you can share would be much appreciated!
- Codon: Python Compiler
What are some alternatives?
shap - A game theoretic approach to explain the output of any machine learning model.
Numba - NumPy aware dynamic Python compiler using LLVM
DALEX - moDel Agnostic Language for Exploration and eXplanation
functorch - functorch is JAX-like composable function transforms for PyTorch.
lucid - A collection of infrastructure and tools for research in neural network interpretability.
julia - The Julia Programming Language
flax - Flax is a neural network library for JAX that is designed for flexibility.
Pytorch - Tensors and Dynamic neural networks in Python with strong GPU acceleration
Cython - The most widely used Python to C compiler
WeightWatcher - The WeightWatcher tool for predicting the accuracy of Deep Neural Networks
jax-windows-builder - A community supported Windows build for jax.