brython VS Elm

Or through an interpreter: https://github.com/brython-dev/brython

I'm a bit sceptical. It's actually not the first time someone wants to include Python in the browser, for example, brython has tried something similar.

This uses Pyodide [0] under the hood [1], which is CPython compiled to WebAssembly. In all my tests of it, loading takes a long time ~5 seconds. Coldbrew [2], another distribution of CPython on Wasm, is another option with similar load times.

And Brython [3] is a completely different option without long load time: a Python interpreter implemented in JavaScript.

If load time is important, Brython is pretty nice. If feature completeness is important, Pyodide and Coldbrew are probably best.

[0] https://github.com/pyscript/pyscript/blob/main/pyscriptjs/sr...

[1] https://github.com/pyodide/pyodide

[2] https://github.com/plasticityai/coldbrew

[3] https://github.com/brython-dev/brython

Brython python implementation that runs in the browser

Yes you can use a tool such as brython. But i think you should learn javascript of you want to be a web developer.

Check out Brython: https://github.com/brython-dev/brython

https://github.com/brython-dev/brython/blob/master/www/console.html is https://brython.info/console.html - a full interpreter running in the browser

Elm [1] is based on a similar idea. Build your app from pure functions that return HTML tags.

[1] https://elm-lang.org/

You also wouldn't really be creating your own new programing language. You would be creating something that can run JavaScript by following JavaScript standards and syntax. You might be able to add some non-standard features of your own on top of those standards, or include your own standard library of helpers or utilities, but you can't completely make a new or alternative language and then load it in the browser (or at least not by reimplementing ECMAScript standards... you actually can make your own language that runs within any Javascript enviroment, if you provide an interpreter or compiler that transforms it into valid JS. Some people have done something like this, eg Elm: https://elm-lang.org/).

You should at least have a look at https://elm-lang.org/ it is a pure functional language like Haskell (although with fewer fancy syntax/type classes) but it has some lovely libraries for visualisation and even with plain elm (+ elm-ui) doing string transformations can be easily done.

I get it. However, the whole point of using Unions to narrow your types, ensure only a set of possible scenarios can occur, and only access data of a particular union when it’s safe to do so. That’s some of what pattern matching can provide, and 100% of what using switch statements in TypeScript with their Discriminated Unions can provide. Yes, it’s not 100% exhaustive, but TypeScript is not soundly typed, and even Elm which is still has the same issue TypeScript does: You’re running in JavaScript where anything is possible. So it’s good enough to build with and much better than what you had.

The beauty of a language like Elm (and other lambda-calculus / functional programming inspired languages) is that there's very little transformation involved in going from an idea to code. And that seems to have a big impact on getting things done.

I think the most fun and approachable way for beginners to build games with functional programming is with Elm [1].

See a few (small, demo) games built by the community in [2] .

Notice Elm has abandoned the FRP approach in favor of Model-View-Update [3].

[1] https://elm-lang.org/