Elm
purescript
Our great sponsors
- Onboard AI - Learn any GitHub repo in 59 seconds
- InfluxDB - Collect and Analyze Billions of Data Points in Real Time
- SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Elm | purescript | |
---|---|---|
195 | 50 | |
7,334 | 8,346 | |
0.4% | 0.5% | |
0.0 | 7.6 | |
11 days ago | 5 days ago | |
Haskell | Haskell | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Elm
-
Can you make your own JavaScript by implementing ECMAScript standard?
You also wouldn't really be creating your own new programing language. You would be creating something that can run JavaScript by following JavaScript standards and syntax. You might be able to add some non-standard features of your own on top of those standards, or include your own standard library of helpers or utilities, but you can't completely make a new or alternative language and then load it in the browser (or at least not by reimplementing ECMAScript standards... you actually can make your own language that runs within any Javascript enviroment, if you provide an interpreter or compiler that transforms it into valid JS. Some people have done something like this, eg Elm: https://elm-lang.org/).
- Course using F#: Write your own tiny programming system(s)
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
I get it. However, the whole point of using Unions to narrow your types, ensure only a set of possible scenarios can occur, and only access data of a particular union when it’s safe to do so. That’s some of what pattern matching can provide, and 100% of what using switch statements in TypeScript with their Discriminated Unions can provide. Yes, it’s not 100% exhaustive, but TypeScript is not soundly typed, and even Elm which is still has the same issue TypeScript does: You’re running in JavaScript where anything is possible. So it’s good enough to build with and much better than what you had.
-
How to render a basic calendar UI in Elm
The beauty of a language like Elm (and other lambda-calculus / functional programming inspired languages) is that there's very little transformation involved in going from an idea to code. And that seems to have a big impact on getting things done.
- Como desenvolvi um backend web em Clojure
-
Is it possible to write games like Pac-Man in a functional language?
I think the most fun and approachable way for beginners to build games with functional programming is with Elm [1].
See a few (small, demo) games built by the community in [2] .
Notice Elm has abandoned the FRP approach in favor of Model-View-Update [3].
- Qual a linguagem que vocês mais gostam de programar?
-
Node still seems better than python after all this time for web server speed but..
Also check out some "compiled to JS" langs like https://elm-lang.org/.
- Ask HN: What are some of the most elegant codebases in your favorite language?
-
Is there any alternative other than JavaScript to deal with web frontend?
Elm has an impressive take on how to model front-end apps and claims to avoid a whole category of issues.
purescript
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are.
-
Is there a better way to do read-only types
Unless you want to switch to https://www.purescript.org/.
- (strongly typed) functional language compilers running in browser
-
purescript VS purs-eval - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 2 Mar 2023
- Por que Elm é uma linguagem tão deliciosa?
-
My main beef with Haskell/JS
Assuming this is a PS knock, fwiw this went away a good bit ago: https://github.com/purescript/purescript/releases/tag/v0.14.2
- 10 years of Scala.js
-
purerl - Integrating PureScript into Elixir projects
PureScript is a Haskell-like language aimed at providing an alternative to TypeScript for statically typed programming in the JavaScript space. I highly recommend taking a look at PureScript for your compile-to-JavaScript needs outside of the use case we'll be talking about in this post.
-
Ask HN: Uncommon Web Languages?
Tons of them, but I am most interested in the following for various reasons:
PureScript[1] — been around a long time. Looks a lot like Haskell to me.
Derw[2] — Elm-like, interesting integration with Typescript
Amber[3] — smalltalk for js
Rescript[4] — its been awhile since i last looked at this project (during a catastrophic rebrand) so I'm not sure where this project is at, but it did seem very promising to me at one point.
[1]: https://www.purescript.org/
-
2022 State of Haskell Survey
Thinking about "tools" in a more general sense, there is Pandoc,¹ which is an end-user application, and PureScirpt,² a programming language.
What are some alternatives?
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
fp-ts - Functional programming in TypeScript
reason - Simple, fast & type safe code that leverages the JavaScript & OCaml ecosystems
elm-reactor
haskelm - Haskell to Elm translation using Template Haskell. Contains both a library and executable.
Idris2 - A purely functional programming language with first class types
yew - Rust / Wasm framework for creating reliable and efficient web applications
reflex - Interactive programs without callbacks or side-effects. Functional Reactive Programming (FRP) uses composable events and time-varying values to describe interactive systems as pure functions. Just like other pure functional code, functional reactive code is easier to get right on the first try, maintain, and reuse.
idris - A Dependently Typed Functional Programming Language
liquidhaskell - Liquid Types For Haskell
polysemy - :gemini: higher-order, no-boilerplate monads