bitwarden-autotype VS Bitwarden

Anyway, Bitwarden is free and the auto-type app is free too.

I wrote an application that does the same: Bitwarden Auto-Type. Among the features is TOTP, I used the RFC 6238 reference implementation (if you wish to write your own).

Bear in mind that you can always use AHK to extract zip files via COM. For example I wrote a few functions to handle zip/unzip (here) used in a project. with that in a Lib, you can do something like:

I wrote a small app in AHK for Bitwarden (which is a password manager). Lives outside the browsers yet you have auto-typing capabilities within browsers and any other app.

I built a small app around the CLI tool to provide KeePass-like Auto-Type capabilities but I don't like being a walking-talking advertising, however by what you post seemed a good fit.

Thus I wrote a workaround with RegEx, but that one is not battle tested, so for the time being I leave the no space between values. But in other instances (ini) where I can control the outcome I use the proper spacing :P

curl -sI https://github.com/anonymous1184/bitwarden-autotype/releases/download/v1.1.3/setup.exe | findstr Location Location: https://objects.githubusercontent.com/github-production-release-asset-2e65be/249704206/0364f9db-5321-46a9-a148-2371c0986d61?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIWNJYAX4CSVEH53A%2F20211116%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20211116T180120Z&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-Signature=81386c5d2b434355188d70bf152eaf593447f6858e264f6f4a6573ceb4d8eb86&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&actor_id=0&key_id=0&repo_id=249704206&response-content-disposition=attachment%3B%20filename%3Dsetup.exe&response-content-type=application%2Foctet-stream

I was looking through the Bitwarden server repository (https://github.com/bitwarden/server ) and was surprised to see that no comments (xml or otherwise) were availible.

Is this normal in an entreprise setting? I thought it was standard to comment every public member (Visual Studio warnings).

For passwords and 2FA I use Bitwarden in combination with a self-hosted Vaultwarden service (for imcreased security and use of pro features for free).

First it's good to use a password manager, however it's not a good idea to use the one built into your browser. I would suggest switching to BitWarden or similar (not LastPass).

I just noticed today when relogging in on Bitwarden (I couldn't sync my vault) that it said "Logged in as [email] on __$2__" instead of "Logged in as [email] on bitwarden.com". I don't know why or how that happened, and I have no idea what it means. Did I screw up somehow? Just to be clear, I did login and just after I logged in my brain realized that it said "__$2__" instead of what it should say.

bitwarden:~$ sudo ./bitwarden.sh updateself _ _ _ _ | |__ (_) |___ ____ _ _ __ __| | ___ _ __ | '_ \| | __\ \ /\ / / _` | '__/ _` |/ _ \ '_ \ | |_) | | |_ \ V V / (_| | | | (_| | __/ | | | |_.__/|_|\__| \_/\_/ \__,_|_| \__,_|\___|_| |_| Open source password management solutions Copyright 2015-2023, 8bit Solutions LLC https://bitwarden.com, https://github.com/bitwarden =================================================== bitwarden.sh version 2023.10.3 Docker version 24.0.7, build afdd53b Docker Compose version v2.21.0 Updated self. bitwarden:~$ sudo ./bitwarden.sh update _ _ _ _ | |__ (_) |___ ____ _ _ __ __| | ___ _ __ | '_ \| | __\ \ /\ / / _` | '__/ _` |/ _ \ '_ \ | |_) | | |_ \ V V / (_| | | | (_| | __/ | | | |_.__/|_|\__| \_/\_/ \__,_|_| \__,_|\___|_| |_| Open source password management solutions Copyright 2015-2023, 8bit Solutions LLC https://bitwarden.com, https://github.com/bitwarden =================================================== bitwarden.sh version 2023.10.3 Docker version 24.0.7, build afdd53b Docker Compose version v2.21.0 Update not needed bitwarden:~$

Bitwarden (version 8588): A secure and free password manager for all of your devices.

I would also recommend the use of a password manager such as Proton Pass, BitWarden or 1Password if your looking for a more premium solution.