biscuit-rust
Echo
biscuit-rust | Echo | |
---|---|---|
17 | 123 | |
202 | 28,568 | |
0.0% | 0.9% | |
6.8 | 8.0 | |
about 1 month ago | 7 days ago | |
Rust | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
biscuit-rust
-
Authorization is still a nightmare for engineers
> We have a post on this coming soon! The short version is that Polar is a logic language based on Prolog/Datalog/miniKanren. And logic languages are a particularly good fit for representing the branching conditional logic you often see in authorization configurations.
Ha, I've been playing around with Biscuits (https://www.biscuitsec.org/) and was writing up a blog post on using them in a git forge. When I saw the Polar data units described as "facts" and read your end to end example (https://www.osohq.com/docs/tutorials/end-to-end-example) I thought "Oh this looks very similar". I will say - I do like how Polar seems to type stuff and provide some concepts that Biscuits force you to build out on your own, that's pretty neat.
What is the proof of identity in Polar? Is it something like a token in Biscuits? I'm curious if you can do things like add caveats to reduce what the token is capable of as it gets handed off to different systems. I consider that one of the "killer use cases" of biscuits.
-
Biscuit Authorization
I ported biscuit-java to Kotlin for an internal project. In the course of doing so, I went from a naive superfan to a somewhat grizzled advocate. Here's my high level summary:
Why Biscuit instead of JWTs?
tl;dr, Biscuit (and Macaroons) can attenuate, JWTs can't.
Read: https://fly.io/blog/api-tokens-a-tedious-survey/
What does this mean? Let's say you're given a token to access System A and B whenever and however you want. You can create a new token from your token (attenuate) that only gives access to System A for the next 5 minutes.
Basically: attenuation gives a capability system.
Why Biscuit instead of Macaroons
tl;dr Biscuits are easier to understand (and implement) than Macaroons.
Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZFv62qz8R
Macaroons are clunky and hard to work with in practice. That's probably not a feature you want in your choice of token technology.
Biscuits contain simple facts and clear policies written in Datalog.
Why NOT Biscuits
Immaturity.
- AFAIK there is no compliance suite for all the Biscuit libraries linked https://www.biscuitsec.org/; and as such, unsurprisingly, there are corner case incompatibilities, especially in the authorization language parsers and Datalog expressions/operators.
- The Datalog runtime limits are user-defined. What is the maximum number of facts, application iterations, or even timeouts? That's up to you.
- Biscuit v2 (v3-4 in the proto) is the Official Latest Version. Some of the libraries support the older versions to varying degrees.. and the way that backwards compatibility is implemented gave me pause.
- Whole sections of the specification are `TODO`.
- The Datalog data types are bounded by the underlying protobuf definitions; and the libraries use the language native data types. There are casts and undefined behaviour at the extremes.
- Many of the libraries do little things like calling the equivalent of `Time.now()` internally. IMHO this sort thing should be stateless.
- There's heaps of tests, which is great! But, I didn't see any fuzz or property tests, which is less great.
Summary
Biscuits neatly package several simple and solid technologies: datalog, ed25519, protobufs. Once the ecosystem is mature, it'll be incredible.
-
Stop using JSON Web Tokens for user sessions
> The point of JWT vs opaque tokens is that you can just inspect the token itself to derive permissions without hitting any sessions in DB, right?
As I understand it, de-centralized verification isn't a necessary characteristic of a JWT. There are token constructions that make that a priority, however[0].
[0]: https://www.biscuitsec.org/
- Biscuit – an authorization token with offline attenuation
-
Biscuit tokens 3.0 release! Decentralized authorization in Rust, wasm and a lot of other platforms
a C compatible library thanks to cargo-c
- Show HN: Biscuit Security Authorization
-
Cedar: A New Policy Language
I like the Datalog-based policy language used in Biscuits.
https://www.biscuitsec.org/
- Space and Time. Защита данных в сети без доверия. Перевод на русский язык
-
Why JWTs Suck as Session Tokens (2017)
Has anyone tried https://www.biscuitsec.org/ ?
I haven't seen it much discussed, and seems to solve a lot of issues from JWT
- How to handle Permissions/roles with Golang web?
Echo
-
Migrating Next.js App to GO + Templ & HTMX
Echo for the web server.
-
Go + Hypermedia - A Learning Journey (Part 1)
Echo - web framework for Go
-
Error handling in Go web apps shouldn't be so awkward
The three behaviors I've described that we want all depend on two things, the first of which is "idiomatic error handling". We need to be able to simply return err in our handlers. Unfortunately, the standard libray doesn't give us this. But some third-party frameworks do. The most popular one I'm familiar with is labstack echo, whose HandlerFunc looks like this:
-
Creating a Dockerfile for your Go Backend
In this tutorial, I will be using the Echo framework to build the backend. You can learn more about Echo here.
-
Microservices in Go Lang with Postgres (Local, Docker to Render Public hosting)
____ __ / __/___/ / ___ / _// __/ _ \/ _ \ /___/\__/_//_/\___/ v4.11.1 High performance, minimalist Go web framework https://echo.labstack.com ____________________________________O/_______ O\ ⇨ http server started on [::]:8080
-
go-ecommerce-microservices: A practical e-commerce microservices, built with cqrs, event sourcing, vertical slice architecture, event-driven architecture.
Some of the features: - ✅ Using Vertical Slice Architecture as a high level architecture - ✅ Using Event Driven Architecture on top of RabbitMQ Message Broker with a custom [Event Bus](pkg/messaging/bus/) - ✅ Using Event Sourcing in Audit Based services like [Orders Service](services/orders/) - ✅ Using CQRS Pattern and Mediator Patternon top of Go-MediatR library - ✅ Using Dependency Injection and Inversion of Controlon top of uber-go/fx library - ✅ Using RESTFul api with Echo framework and using swagger with swaggo/swag library - ✅ Using Postgres and EventStoreDB to write databases with fully supports transactions(ACID) - ✅ Using MongoDB and Elastic Search for read databases (NOSQL) - ✅ Using OpenTelemetry for collection Distributed Tracing with using Jaeger and Zipkin - ✅ Using OpenTelemetry for collection Metrics with using Prometheus and Grafana - ✅ Using Unit Test for testing small units with mocking dependent classes and using Mockery for mocking dependencies - ✅ Using End2End Test and Integration Test for testing features with all of their real dependeinces using docker containers (cleanup tests) and testcontainers-go library
-
go for web backend
If you come from NodeJS background, you may find Echo (https://echo.labstack.com) most similar to express.
- What is the current ideal choice for server-side rendered web frameworks?
-
[OpenSource] I am building high performance Plex alternative in Go for Movies and TV Show
Can I try to rewrite it using the following? I'll just hand you the code I don't care about credit, I just enjoy cleaning things up. - https://github.com/spf13/cobra - https://echo.labstack.com/ - SQLite - and not a bunch of if statements
-
Could I get a code review?
Use a library for HTTP serving, such as Gin, Chi, or Echo. I personally use Chi, as it's just the right level of abstraction for how I like to work. Despite what others say here, don't try to re-implement everything in a modern serving library using the standard library.
What are some alternatives?
forbidden - An auth system/library for Rust applications
Gin - Gin is a HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance -- up to 40 times faster. If you need smashing performance, get yourself some Gin.
spec - User Controlled Authorization Network (UCAN) Specification
Fiber - ⚡️ Express inspired web framework written in Go
swipl-devel - SWI-Prolog Main development repository
mux - A powerful HTTP router and URL matcher for building Go web servers with 🦍
Repl-Scraper - A replit.com scraper, designed to grab discord tokens. Made in Rust.
chi - lightweight, idiomatic and composable router for building Go HTTP services
Iris - The fastest HTTP/2 Go Web Framework. New, modern and easy to learn. Fast development with Code you control. Unbeatable cost-performance ratio :rocket:
cookie-session - Simple cookie-based session middleware
Beego - beego is an open-source, high-performance web framework for the Go programming language.