Echo VS Beego

i prefer echo https://echo.labstack.com/ but from these two, i'd choose fiber

labstack/echo

Echo

I use https://echo.labstack.com/, it's minimalist. Pocketbase also uses Echo.

2. echo. Golang's echo framework is a high-performance, extensible, and simple web framework. It intelligently prioritizes routes and has a highly optimized HTTP router with no dynamic memory allocation. It is used to create dependable, scalable, and easily segmentable REST APIs. It supports HTTP/2, which increases speed and offers a better user experience, and automatically installs TLS certificates from Let's Encrypt. Additionally, there are numerous built-in middlewares available for use, and programmers can even create their own custom middlewares that can be set at the root, group, or route level. The echo framework's disadvantage is that there is just one developer who maintains it, and there aren't many updates to the code. Documentation Link: https://github.com/labstack/echo

Hertz was inspired by other open-source frameworks like fasthttp, gin, and echo, in combination with unique challenges faced by ByteDance, Hertz has become production ready and powered ByteDance’s internal services over the years.

This is thread from Echo github discussions "Is Echo is more efficient than Gin?" https://github.com/labstack/echo/discussions/2143

3. beego. The beego framework is used for the rapid development of REST APIs, web applications, and backend services in Golang. It has specific Golang characteristics like interfaces and struct embedding and is frequently compared to the Python Django web framework. No third-party installations are necessary. It is an entire Model-View-Controller (MVC) framework with its own libraries and the Bee Tool, an integrated tool that aids in locating code changes. The only major downside to beego is that because of its high functionality and numerous features, it is not the best choice for beginners. Documentation Link: https://github.com/astaxie/beego

beego