benign-key-logger VS kb-layout-evaluation

I have not used this, but I understand benign-key-logger[1] was made for this use case.

[1] https://github.com/Ga68/benign-key-logger

Consider running a keylogger to log your most common macros, and build layers from there.

I use this keylogger: https://github.com/Ga68/benign-key-logger

I've done exactly that using this tool as a starting point.

https://github.com/Ga68/benign-key-logger is an option

For others who might be following along, here’s a link for convenience: Benign Key Logger.

A few days of usage, 56000 key presses, logged with a simple python file https://github.com/Ga68/benign-key-logger, viewing using sql lite studio

Maybe you can get Portuguese bigrams frequency and run this: https://github.com/bclnr/kb-layout-evaluation I don’t know how different it is from French or Spanish.

I wrote a layout analyzer at some point and that was the reasoning.

And indeed quantitative studies tend to show that Colemak can be very good for other languages, for instance French: https://github.com/bclnr/kb-layout-evaluation (although you need to modify it slightly to add accented characters to reasonable spots). Interestingly enough, French variant of Qwerty (Azerty) is much worse than Colemak or anything.

A while ago I coded a little comparison between layouts to help me with that decision, you might find it useful: https://github.com/bclnr/kb-layout-evaluation

> Some forward-thinking people have set about evaluating key layouts objectively on metrics like these.

[...]

> What If You’re Bilingual?

On that topic some might be interested in this little analysis:

https://github.com/bclnr/kb-layout-evaluation

These scoring systems already exist. Here's the first one I found: https://github.com/bclnr/kb-layout-evaluation