below VS smenu

below is good. Enable the service and add the --dict-compress-chunk-size argument, and you can keep a week of... pretty much everything, by cgroup and by process, at 5 second sampling period, in under 1 GB of /var/log space.

IO wait is counted against load by linux. So high IO pressure, i.e. found in `/proc/pressure`

I'm liking this project https://github.com/facebookincubator/below

It's packaged in Fedora.

I created something similar for our project “below” (https://github.com/facebookincubator/below/blob/main/below/b...).

The program collects system resource metrics into a data structure and we need to display the fields with different styles and formats. In order to decouple the data structure from rendering, Queriable (Keyable) and FieldId (combine KeyPath + mirror struct into enum) are used. I will definitely like to checkout the KeyPath implementation as it seems more general.

System Monitors: Would include Below.

I have been using glances for a terminal sysmon but I don't like that it eats so much RAM. Can someone please recommend a system monitor that is easy to comprehend and less resource hungry?

I am also curious about below [0] since it came up recently.

[0] https://github.com/facebookincubator/below

Below! https://github.com/facebookincubator/below

You can also use smenu (https://github.com/p-gen/smenu) to make these and many other selections.

Here are the relevant bits of the source (in [smenu.c](https://github.com/p-gen/smenu/blob/master/smenu.c):

Here are the bindings for smenu-history, I found somewhere at the site:

I suggest a name change, so your smenu, isn't confused with this smenu, which is a totally different entity, can present the menus in columns, lines and tabular fashion, has hotkey support, and so much more, I don't know if it is POSIX compliant, but it can also be used with sh, and just not bash.

smenu for menu and dialogs