-
On the surface looks like an improvement over htop ( which I've been using for 10+ years )
But this is the kind of software that I would want to keep using. Will btop keep being supported? Is btop going to be available in practically all distros I use? Even currently on Arch its only in the AUR.
Its also concerning there is btop[0] and bpytop[1]? I don't understand the difference.
[0]https://github.com/aristocratos/btop
[1]https://github.com/aristocratos/bpytop
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
Maybe bottom[0]? I use bpytop but probably wouldn't recommend it on account of how heavy it is. I remember bottom being pretty lightweight when I used it, without sacrificing readability.
[0] https://github.com/ClementTsang/bottom
-
On the surface looks like an improvement over htop ( which I've been using for 10+ years )
But this is the kind of software that I would want to keep using. Will btop keep being supported? Is btop going to be available in practically all distros I use? Even currently on Arch its only in the AUR.
Its also concerning there is btop[0] and bpytop[1]? I don't understand the difference.
[0]https://github.com/aristocratos/btop
[1]https://github.com/aristocratos/bpytop
-
I have been using glances for a terminal sysmon but I don't like that it eats so much RAM. Can someone please recommend a system monitor that is easy to comprehend and less resource hungry?
I am also curious about below [0] since it came up recently.
[0] https://github.com/facebookincubator/below
-
-
-
I recommend the C reimplementation of iotop btw, it has lots more features and is more efficient and is maintained. It is packaged as iotop-c in Debian and other distros.
https://github.com/Tomas-M/iotop
-
-
https://github.com/MacPaw/XADMaster
in difference to unp and atool, unar does not depend on other tools to unpack the actual archive