BDE VS etl

Hi, one of the authors here. BlazingMQ depends on two other open source C++ libraries: https://github.com/bloomberg/bde and https://github.com/bloomberg/ntf-core. I believe documentation writer wanted to highlight that BlazingMQ does not depend on frameworks like ZooKeeper, etc.

It would be easy to make the runtime use polymorphic allocators, one for the temporary objects created by update_methods, and another for the hash and dispatch tables. The first allocator could use the stack (like this), and the second a block in the BSS segment.

I'm pretty sure they use C++ very extensively. They have their own C++ standard library for example. I'm not aware of them using FORTRAN or C. Do you have a reference for that?

No first-hand experience, but C++ is definitely a player. Check out John Lakos and bloomberg/bde. He was a force behind the improved allocators in C++11 and beyond. That repo I linked is a beast of a codebase (:

Specifying your own allocator is like a main feature of bde from Bloomberg:

https://github.com/bloomberg/bde

If I remember correctly, BDE ( https://github.com/bloomberg/bde ) is developed in London's office and definitely the team that works on it is one of the most experienced in the company.

Libc++ hasn't implemented polymorphic containers and similar. You could take a look at what inspired PMR: https://github.com/bloomberg/bde/

If you can't use the STL because of exceptions: https://www.etlcpp.com/

You can also use ETL (https://www.etlcpp.com)

Use ETL for embedded standard library functionality: https://www.etlcpp.com/

The best choice here is use embedded Template Library: https://www.etlcpp.com/

If you can't get C++23, expected it's implemented in the ETL (it's also just a really amazing library for this kind of stuff - highly recommend!).

I want to use some of C++ std library classes/functions in my embedded system library project that I'm writing. However as the environment has limited ressources I don't want to have use or expose classes or functions that do the following: * Dynamic memory allocations * RTTI * Runtime exceptions I will be rewriting some basic container and algorithms according to my needs. I know that there are other re writes of STL like ESTL but I don't want to have any external dependencies So my question is can I somehow compile/package a fork of C++ std library that only include embedded systems friendly classes such as: - array - tuple - variant - type_traits Etc This compiled library must be completely standalone. The compiler that I use can support upto C++17 standard.

I will never not recommend the Embedded Template Library

STL containers use dynamic memory allocation which is often a no-no in embedded contexts. there is the ETL https://www.etlcpp.com/ but I haven't used it!