aws-lambda-power-tuning VS serverless-application-model

Sometimes, changing services, like opting for HTTP over REST API Gateway, leveraging tools like Lambda Powertuning to optimize functions, or reducing a CloudWatch log retention and changing log level, can lead to significant savings.

In case of not enabling SnapStart for the Lambda function we observed that increasing memory reduces the warm execution time for our use case especially for p>90. As adding more memory to the Lambda function is also a cost factor, the sweet spot between cold and warm start time and cost is somewhere between 768 and 1204 MB memory setting for the Lambda function for our use case. You can use AWS Lambda Power Tuning for very nice visualisations.

The aws lambda power tuning tool helps optimise the Lambda performance and cost in a data-driven manner. Let's try it out:

For Lambda, a very useful tool to help optimise is the AWS Lambda Power Tuning tool, released by Alex Casalboni, Developer Advocate at AWS: https://github.com/alexcasalboni/aws-lambda-power-tuning

Lambda memory affects not only the CPU performance and and host execution priority, but also network performance. Be wary though as the price scales linearly. You can use a tool like Lambda Power Tuning to find the sweet spot for your application. https://github.com/alexcasalboni/aws-lambda-power-tuning

This tool, which is open source and available here, takes the form of a Step Function that is deployed on your AWS account. The purpose of this Step Function is to run your lambda with different memory configurations several times and output a comparison in the form of a graph (or JSON) to try to find the optimal balance between cost and execution time. There are three possible optimization modes: cost, execution time, or a "balanced" mode where it tries to find a balance between the two.

The AWS Documentation's Memory and Computing Power page is a good starting point. To avoid configuring it manually, it's worth checking out AWS Lambda Power Tuning, which will help you find the sweet spot.

Utilizing tools such as AWS X-Ray, AWS Lambda Power Tuning, and AWS Lambda Powertools tracer utility is recommended. Read more about it here.

Install the AWS SAM CLI in your local environment. Configure your AWS credentials (requires AWS CLI installed): $ aws configure Clone this git repository: $ git clone https://github.com/alexcasalboni/aws-lambda-power-tuning.git Build the Lambda layer and any other dependencies (Docker is required): $ cd ./aws-lambda-power-tuning $ sam build -u sam build -u will run SAM build using a Docker container image that provides an environment similar to that which your function would run in. SAM build in-turn looks at your AWS SAM template file for information about Lambda functions and layers in this project. Once the build has completed you should see output that states Build Succeeded. If not there will be error messages providing guidance on what went wrong. Deploy the application using the SAM deploy "guided" mode: $ sam deploy -g

Use AWS Lambda Power Tuning to balance cost and performance.

The complete solution with SAM is available here.

There are many options to deploy Serverless Applications in AWS and one of them is SAM, the Serverless Application Model. I chose to use it here, because it doesn't add too many layers of abstraction between what's being deployed and the code we write and our infrastructure is quite simple.

The solution uses AWS SAM with the global configuration for Lambda functions and the public API you can use to access Apache Zeppelin. The stack deployment provides the URL as an output value.

When you combine this with the AWS Serverless Application Model you can also very easily include your dependencies. Or use a compiled language like golang for your Lambda functions. You simply run sam build before you run the aws cloudformation package and aws cloudformation deploy commands. SAM will build the binary and update the template to point to the newly built binary. Package will then upload it to S3 and replace the local reference to the S3 location. Deploy can then create or update the stack or you can use the CloudFormation integration in CodePipeline.

I'm a big fan of using an Infrastructure as Code (IaC) approach for any project. My go to tools for this are the Servlerless Application Model (SAM) and it's associated CLI (SAM CLI). For more official use cases and for cross platform apps I typically use Terraform.

AWS SAM

Kicking off the tour and not starting a war, but I'm going to be using the Serverless Application Model.

The diagram here is super simple. I'm going to write something a little later that shows how this code could fit into a bigger workflow, but for now, I'm keeping it basic. And yes, that's the SAM Squirrel in there.

Interestingly, AWS CDK and SAM are both explicitly mentioned. While CDK broadly addresses Infrastructure as Code, SAM is highlighted for its role in developing serverless data pipelines - a hugely underrated concept.

Naturally, there are several options available to declare your cloud resources. The options with the most popularity are the CDK, AWS CloudFormation, SST, Serverless framework, Terraform, and AWS SAM. There are others, but when talking about Infrastructure as Code (IaC), these are the ones you hear about most often.