auto-cpufreq VS i-use-arch-btw

github repository

git clone https://github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq.git cd auto-cpufreq && sudo ./auto-cpufreq-installer

I know that Pop os doesn't recommend installing tlp because it might interfere with system-76 power, Is it the same for something like powertop or auto-cpufreq?

The device had only been purchased ~1-2 months ago so I don't think that dust in the fans would be an issue (as suggested in another post; Intel NUC's overheating - Solution!). The installation of Linux is more or less fresh, the only thing (I think) installed that would affect temperatures is auto-cpufreq (which has slightly lowered temperatures).

I dont know how well it actually works but I use this: https://github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq

auto-cpufreq (switching between performance- and powersaving mode),

You can also use tools like auto-cpufreq to reduce your cpu frequencies when not in heavy load. auto-cpufreq can be configured a lot to meet your specific needs. auto-cpufreq: https://github.com/AdnanHodzic/auto-cpufreq

In this post, we'll work with the Pro version on Arch Linux (I use Arch, btw) to cover as many of the features as possible.

a better language is I use Arch btw:

I do love the 'I use Arch BTW' Meme. And I also found this to be interesting. Not sure what to make of it yet. Not sure if I even want to put that on my machine. Looks a little untrustworthy without reading the code. :)

Well, just use I use Arch btw, the best programming language while using arch linux os. I use arch btw

It's not a ready distro, you write it yourself using I use arch BTW.

I use arch btw