Audited VS Ruby on Rails

👆This and Audited Gem

paper_trail is a good suggestion, I’ve worked with it in the past 👍 Another one that I found during the current investigation is https://github.com/collectiveidea/audited

that and also have a look at audited https://github.com/collectiveidea/audited

Omarchy is an opinionated Arch distro created by David Heinemeier Hansson (DHH), creator of Rails, Basecamp and Hey. Under the hood it's Arch Linux + Hyprland, but it ships with everything pre-configured: lock screen, menu bar, bluetooth, themes, keybindings. No installing packages one by one.

Phoenix is a framework for Elixir, the same way Rails is a framework for Ruby. Its mission is to be a productive framework that doesn't compromise on speed or maintainability.

Why do you say HashWithIndifferentAccess shows a lack of understanding? Like many Rails features, it's a convenience that abstracts away details that some find unpleasant to work with. Rails sometimes takes "magic" to the extreme through meta-programming. However, looking at the source [1], HashWithIndifferentAccess doesn't use eval, send, method_missing, or define_method. So I'm not sure how it seems weird to someone who works more with plain Ruby.

1. https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/fa8f0812160665bff083a089...

Rails 8.1 shipped a genuinely useful feature: a standardized bin/ci script backed by ActiveSupport::ContinuousIntegration. Run your full test suite, linter, and security checks locally before pushing. No cloud bill. No waiting in a CI queue. Just your laptop doing what it was built for.

On August 18, 2009, DHH made a specific commit to the Rails repository introducing db/seeds.rb and the rake db:seed command. The commit message reads:

Laravel, Rails, and Django remain the most battle-tested full-stack frameworks in 2026.

This Rails commit from May 2010 mentions gitkeeps and it's a few months older than your SO post, so it seems you're absolved from guilt:

https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/785493ffed41abcca0686b...