astexplorer
Apollo-11
astexplorer | Apollo-11 | |
---|---|---|
43 | 127 | |
5,953 | 56,593 | |
- | - | |
6.0 | 5.1 | |
10 days ago | 11 days ago | |
JavaScript | Assembly | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
astexplorer
-
Understanding Code Structure: A Beginner's Guide to Tree-sitter
You can play with your code here, and visualise ASTs for the same.
-
What is an Abstract Syntax Tree in Programming?
Website
-
How to create your own Eslint rule with tests, boosting the DX, and code-review
To understand this syntax, I recommend exploring AST Explorer. You will have a better view of how the AST of JavaScript works and how to correlate it with the Eslint syntaxy:
-
Programming from Top to Bottom - Parsing
You can never mistake type_declaration with an identifier, otherwise the program will not work. Aside from that constraint, you are free to name them whatever you like, there is no one standard, and each parser has it own naming conventions, unless you are planning to use something like LLVM. If you are interested, you can see examples of naming in different language parsers in the AST Explorer.
-
ESLint: under the hood
The rule that I want to write will be called not-allows-underscore: the idea is to abolish the use of underscores when declaring variables or functions. It's a real dummy rule, but it should be enough to see in action the concepts that we have discussed earlier. The first thing that I would do is to go to AST Explorer, write down a code that declares variables and functions (both standard and arrows one) and take a look at what type of node is the one that encodes the identifier. Doing that, I found out that the node type of my interest is Identifier, what a surprise! 🤣. In particular, the structure of the node holds the string used as identifier in the name property.
-
😱 ESlint over Conventions - You have Not unlocked the power of ESlint 😱
All the information about the API, AST node names, AST Explorer, etc. you can read in the official documentation. I’m just going to show examples of how to automate the check-up of our created conventions.
- AST Exploret
-
200 Web-Based, Must-Try Web Design and Development Tools
AST Viewer
-
Building a JSON Parser from scratch with JS 🤯
If you want to see how the AST of popular languages looks, I recommend the AST Explorer. It supports various languages, and you can view the complete AST and navigate through the nodes. If you want to go further, you can try to copy some logic from an existing parser and implement it in your own, such as calculating an expression according to precedence order, for example: 1 + 2 * 3 (which is 7, not 9).
-
Creating my own typescript compiler
https://astexplorer.net/ is a good resource/playground for understanding ASTs and transpilers.
Apollo-11
- Original Apollo 11 Guidance Computer (AGC) source code
-
Mistral CEO confirms 'leak' of new open source AI model nearing GPT4 performance
I often like to think about https://github.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11 as an analogy. It's public domain with available source, in the assembly language in which it was written... so it fills all the definitions of OSS!
But the process by which that code arose, the ability to modify any line and understand its impact (heh) on a real execution environment, is dependent on a massive process that required billions of dollars and thousands of the smartest people on the planet. For all intents and purposes, without that environment, it is as reliably modifiable as an executable binary in any other context - or a set of weights, in this one!
-
Can a Transformer Represent a Kalman Filter?
But can a Transformer run on the Apollo Guidance Computer?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer
Frequency 2.048 MHz
Memory 15-bit wordlength + 1-bit parity
2048 words RAM (magnetic-core memory)
https://github.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11/blob/master/Luminar...
-
TIL an Oxford University physicist claimed that for the moon landing conspiracy to be true, around 411,000 people would’ve needed to keep it secret. He also suggests the hoax would’ve broken down in 3.68 years.
You can look at the Colossus 2A code written by Margaret Hamilton and her very small team on Github.
- "Temporary" code in Apollo 11's lunar landing guidance equations (1969)
-
SpaceX poised for 'mid-November' launch of second Starship test flight
"Burn Baby Burn" might be even more apt!
https://github.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11/blob/master/Luminar...
-
Software Disenchantment
My more positive take on this: our runtime environments are bloated because we have ways to enable trust, stability, and iteration speeds that people wouldn't have dreamed of in years past.
Your Notion desktop app and Google Chrome both support embedding & displaying multimedia content that's controlled by people that you may not trust, but they can draw on decades of engineering to sandbox that content. They can independently be updated without worrying about a centralized `flexbox.dll` that may or may not be the right version. They do not require building a new executable to make the vast majority of UI changes. And the cost is simply storage space and initial download bandwidth.
We can look with rose-colored glasses at an era of "every byte of assembly has been hand-crafted." I, too, look in awe at what was achieved with such things as https://github.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11/tree/master/Luminar... . But that software, per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer#Softw..., took 1400 person-years of work.
We have to compare apples to apples - the abstractions we have today would not prevent such a piece of software from being built, and indeed would allow us to build that exact software, even bit-for-bit the same, much more easily due to abstractions on our tooling itself. We have not departed a world where, given a nation-state budget, one could pay for 1400 person-years of work and create the AGC (though one might make arguments about the distraction levels of modern society, but that's a different thing entirely).
But we also exist in a world where I can build and ship a cross-platform video chat application in an afternoon (well, not counting app store approvals) and be reasonably confident that my app will be compatible with, and secure on, practically any computer or mobile device sold in the past half decade, regardless of how many other apps may have been installed on each device. I'd venture to say that Apollo engineers would, and do, find this aspect of our world fascinating, too.
- NASA's Voyager Team Focuses on Software Patch, Thrusters
-
Margaret Hamilton stands next to her handwritten code for the lunar missions
Thankfully it was eventually migrated to GitHub
What are some alternatives?
deno_swc - The SWC compiler for Deno.
DOOM - DOOM Open Source Release
gogocode - GoGoCode is a transformer for JavaScript/Typescript/HTML based on AST but providing a more intuitive API.
microwatt - A tiny Open POWER ISA softcore written in VHDL 2008
vscode-language-tree - VSCode tree format support
midimonster - Multi-protocol control & translation software (ArtNet, MIDI, OSC, sACN, ...)
ChakraCore - ChakraCore is an open source Javascript engine with a C API.
WebKit - Home of the WebKit project, the browser engine used by Safari, Mail, App Store and many other applications on macOS, iOS and Linux.
Acorn - A small, fast, JavaScript-based JavaScript parser
Godot - Godot Engine – Multi-platform 2D and 3D game engine
proposal-type-annotations - ECMAScript proposal for type syntax that is erased - Stage 1
GraphRedex - An interactive semantics explorer